MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,733
|
Post by MDDad on Oct 31, 2019 9:43:22 GMT -8
Please, vp. Now you're just insulting our intelligence.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 31, 2019 9:57:18 GMT -8
Only if your intelligence doesn't allow you to believe the truth.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Oct 31, 2019 10:17:42 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 31, 2019 12:45:32 GMT -8
You think you know a lot, but so far it's just unconfirmed rumor. Can you even tell the difference?
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Oct 31, 2019 13:12:00 GMT -8
I can. You've resorted to trolling to deflect.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 31, 2019 15:45:11 GMT -8
You think you know a lot, but so far it's just unconfirmed rumor. Can you even tell the difference? You just described the Trump-Russia Collusion narrative, Brett Kavanaugh rape accusations, the Ukraine whistleblower claims, and the "evidence" against Trump in the entire secretive impeachment process thus far undertaken by Adam Schiff. Thank you. |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 31, 2019 15:49:42 GMT -8
Whoops! Tim Morrison--who was actually listening in on the call (unlike the anonymous whistleblower leaker)--just undermined the Trump-Ukraine conspiracy theory. Anybody have an over/under on when the Democrats start accusing a Morrison of being a Russian agent?
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 31, 2019 16:07:13 GMT -8
People call him a patriot because he's a decorated military veteran, and he's doing his duty regardless of the personal consequences. He was wounded in service to this country yet here you are smearing his motives. You're trashing a decorated veteran to try to score a cheap political point. Well done sir. The above sounds a lot like the media's treatment of decorated military veteran Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Because if "smearing someone's motives" to score cheap political points was out of bounds, CNN and MSNBC would have to eliminate most of their programming and you would need to delete just about all your posts about Donald Trump. Both Vindman and you are speculating about (smearing?) the motives of the President. Just because he is a decorated veteran does not make Vindman immune to cross-examination to determine his own motives. When a guy enlists himself in an effort to nullify the votes of 63 million Americans, you're damned right his motives are going to be examined. Yet Adam Schiff directed Vindman not to answer certain Republican questions in his deposition. What are they trying to hide? Sounds like witness tampering. |
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Oct 31, 2019 16:14:21 GMT -8
Also the MSM and Democratic supported networks will ignore it because it doesn't fit their narrative.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 31, 2019 21:44:58 GMT -8
Of course it is and of course he did. He's not even smart enough to deny it. Just ask Judge Napolitano: Judge Andrew Napolitano: Proof of Trump’s impeachable offenses plain to seeNeither you nor Andrew Napolitano has any more insight into this case than what's been made publicly available. You are both entitled to your opinion about a quid pro quo, but that's all that it is--your opinion. To categorically assert that "of course he did"--when no one who actually heard the call is even claiming that--carries no weight whatsoever. Andrew Napolitano is a disappointed office seeker and has become a notorious Trump hater, as a regular viewer of FOX would know. He has an ax to grind with the President so I'll take his speculations here with a grain of salt. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 1, 2019 2:39:47 GMT -8
You mean convicted felon Michael Flynn? You must be very desperate to compare this decorated veteran to a criminal.
I can't speak to what CNN or MSNBC might air but I can say that I don't speak about trump's motives, only his alleged actions.
Wrong. See above.
Of course it doesn't and I'm sure that when the trial moves to the Senate the Republicans will do just that...but I suspect they won't be smearing Col. Vindman like you do.
Witness tampering...rofl. You kill me.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 1, 2019 2:45:25 GMT -8
I would say that Judge Napolitano's legal background gives him more insight than me, and far more insight than you in this matter.
Indeed, and his opinion is far more valuable than yours.
No, but it still carries more weight than your ridiculous claim about the call.
Too funny. I suspect there are other speculations you swallow whole.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 1, 2019 2:47:04 GMT -8
"Democratic supported networks"?
What are those?
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,255
|
Post by RSM789 on Nov 1, 2019 11:28:12 GMT -8
People call him a patriot because he's a decorated military veteran, and he's doing his duty regardless of the personal consequences. He was wounded in service to this country yet here you are smearing his motives... Would you say that Hillary Clinton did the same thing to Tulsi Gabbard? Or was Hillary just being a patriot and pointing out a traitor in our midst? As for Vindman, his life is one of protocol. Our president, not so much. It is easy to see why Vindman might hear things from his perspective that really weren't actually said. |
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,255
|
Post by RSM789 on Nov 1, 2019 11:30:07 GMT -8
"Democratic supported networks"? What are those? Talk about a blind spot... |
|
