|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 3, 2019 8:08:04 GMT -8
You have a very vivid imagination.
Yeah I'll bet...still waiting for the people to be indicted over the fiasco in Benghazi, which we were told would happen very soon...a long time ago.
I do have a question about the tweet you quoted...who the heck is Michael Walsh and why should we care what crazy opinion he has?
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Nov 3, 2019 9:11:26 GMT -8
In 2016 the DNC, FBI, and CIA enlisted help from sources in the U.K., Australia, Italy, Ukraine, and--through the Steele Dossier--Russia to dig up dirt on Donald Trump, all of which turned out to be false. So the idea that the Democrats are now concerned about foreign influence in American elections is worse than a joke. What spooked them to their shorts about Trump's call to Ukraine was that he--along with Bill Barr and John Durham--is getting dangerously close to exposing the genesis of the RussiaCollusion Hoax. Politico already reported on the Ukraine angle I in January 2017. The rest will come out soon. even they know all this nonsense is nonsense. VilePagan knows... Paul and Brad know... Nancy Pelosi knows... everyone knows. It is a witch hunt, just like Trump keeps saying. But they cannot stop digging. Their irrational hatred of the man who beat the woman who would be king has driven them to a point where giving it up and actually doing their jobs would mean admitting it... losing face. their ongoing idiocy is best exemplified by the monkey who cannot let go of the peanut in the jar. THEY KNOW their integrity and dignity would be retained (or some shred of what remains), and the country will be better off if they let go of the peanut... but they can’t. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 3, 2019 9:46:10 GMT -8
Why do you feel the need to include me in your delusional pronouncements? Does my alleged agreement lend your arguments some kind of gravitas?
Believe me when I say that I do not believe any of the nonsense you posted.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Nov 3, 2019 11:54:53 GMT -8
Why do you feel the need to include me in your pronouncements? Believe me when I say that I do not believe any of the nonsense you posted. Wait, Dave wrote that you (among others) know that this nonsense is nonsense. Your response was to first exclude yourself from the list of people who know that, but then to include yourself as knowing that the nonsense is nonsense. If you agree with Dave once, it doesn't mean you two are now BFF's. It is okay to agree with a statement of his, one that is actually giving you credit for not being delusional, without having to align yourself with him. For what it's worth... |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Nov 3, 2019 13:44:40 GMT -8
What ^he^ said
😀
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 4, 2019 3:10:31 GMT -8
Sorry, I didn't mean to confuse anyone. Let me rephrase: Believe me when I say that I do not believe any of the bullshit he posted about what I believe. Understand now?
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Nov 4, 2019 19:56:46 GMT -8
Sorry, I didn't mean to confuse anyone. Let me rephrase: Believe me when I say that I do not believe any of the bullshit he posted about what I believe. Understand now? Not trying to be difficult, but I am not sure of your clarification. Dave wrote that you knew the nonsense is nonsense. Are you saying that statement is true or that it is false, that you don't know the nonsense is nonsense? My sense is that you agree with the statement (that you are aware the nonsense is nonsense), but don't like Dave presuming to know what you believe (even if he is correct). |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 4, 2019 21:36:00 GMT -8
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Nov 5, 2019 8:04:03 GMT -8
Sorry, I didn't mean to confuse anyone. Let me rephrase: Believe me when I say that I do not believe any of the bullshit he posted about what I believe. Understand now? Not trying to be difficult, but I am not sure of your clarification. Dave wrote that you knew the nonsense is nonsense. Are you saying that statement is true or that it is false, that you don't know the nonsense is nonsense? My sense is that you agree with the statement (that you are aware the nonsense is nonsense), but don't like Dave presuming to know what you believe (even if he is correct). |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 5, 2019 9:09:48 GMT -8
I do not agree with you or with Dave about what you think is nonsense.
He is not. He never is. That's why he posts pics of The Three Stooges and other silly gifs...nothing else to add to the discussion.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 5, 2019 18:04:05 GMT -8
Liberal Privilege
What was happening three years ago? Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump.
And who was implicated in the Epstein scandals? Bill Clinton.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 5, 2019 22:54:09 GMT -8
Fake News is the Enemy of the People.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Nov 6, 2019 1:12:44 GMT -8
He is not. He never is... See, that kind of hyperbole shows bias. I disagree with you on a myriad of subjects, but I would be wrong to say you are never correct. Actually wrong is the incorrect word, it would be more along the lines of narcissistic to believe that a person I disagree with is never correct. Taking you at your word and that you truly believe Dave is never correct means that if you disagree with him on everything, then you believe you are always right. I am sure you see the psychological issues with that kind of belief. Further, if Dave is never correct and you find a dozen things to agree with him about, that means you only agree with him when you are incorrect. That is kind of messed up. Here is the real fun one, what if Dave agrees with your statement? If Dave agrees and says he is never correct, then that means the statement is false, because if Dave was never correct, he wouldn't have agreed with the statement. I think you can see the problem with your proclamation. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 6, 2019 4:36:20 GMT -8
Good god RSM you really do have too much time on your hands, and you like to parse people's comments way too much.
Dave is always wrong when he claims to know what I think on any given subject. I hope that statement is clear enough for you to avoid all these logical conundrums which seem to bedevil you.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Nov 6, 2019 8:02:29 GMT -8
He is not. He never is... See, that kind of hyperbole shows bias. I disagree with you on a myriad of subjects, but I would be wrong to say you are never correct. Actually wrong is the incorrect word, it would be more along the lines of narcissistic to believe that a person I disagree with is never correct. Taking you at your word and that you truly believe Dave is never correct means that if you disagree with him on everything, then you believe you are always right. I am sure you see the psychological issues with that kind of belief. Further, if Dave is never correct and you find a dozen things to agree with him about, that means you only agree with him when you are incorrect. That is kind of messed up. Here is the real fun one, what if Dave agrees with your statement? If Dave agrees and says he is never correct, then that means the statement is false, because if Dave was never correct, he wouldn't have agreed with the statement. I think you can see the problem with your proclamation. what he said.  |
|
