Bick
Administrator 
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Apr 11, 2019 9:48:05 GMT -8
The MSM spent hours last evening trashing Barr's character and competence. If anyone ever doubted the bias of these folks, it is truly apparent as the last few weeks the criminality of the Dems has been exposed and they're in full attack mode. This goes all the way to the top of the Democratic Party. What's really disturbing is how so many "common folks" passionately believe what's being fed them. The comments on the various articles and Twitter feeds are telling. |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Apr 11, 2019 18:49:24 GMT -8
I would trade Hillary skating on her emails to have just two guys indicted for their crimes in Spygate. One is John Brennan, likely the instigator of the whole plot. The other is James Comey, the dirty cop who continues to pose as a Boy Scout. To call him slippery is an understatement.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorFate on Apr 11, 2019 22:32:26 GMT -8
The MSM spent hours last evening trashing Barr's character and competence. If anyone ever doubted the bias of these folks, it is truly apparent as the last few weeks the criminality of the Dems has been exposed and they're in full attack mode. This goes all the way to the top of the Democratic Party. Rosenstein is sticking up for Barr now. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein defended Attorney General William Barr's summary of the Special Counsel's report in an interview published Wednesday."He's being as forthcoming as he can, and so this notion that he's trying to mislead people, I think is just completely bizarre," Rosenstein told The Wall Street Journal. www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rosenstein-bizarre-to-say-barr-misleading-public-on-mueller-report/ar-BBVRiD8?li=BBnb7KzThe rug is coming out from under the Democrats little by little. They look more and more foolish every day. |
|
SK80
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 7,376
|
Post by SK80 on Apr 12, 2019 6:00:20 GMT -8
By referring to Democrats you mean the media as well...(insert “wink” emoji)
|
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorFate on Apr 12, 2019 11:25:05 GMT -8
By referring to Democrats you mean the media as well...(insert “wink” emoji) Oh yeah!  Two heads of the same body. |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Apr 18, 2019 6:06:50 GMT -8
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Apr 18, 2019 9:19:59 GMT -8
You wouldn't draw that conclusion this is "over" by reading the headlines. Seems they are drawing the exact opposite conclusions. What a shock!
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Apr 18, 2019 9:46:19 GMT -8
This Opinion piece from the Hill rings true for me, and is consistent with my criticism of the President. I'm fully on board with the notion Mueller wimped out on this. 2 years of investigation to conclude that 'we can't prove that he did it, but can't exonerate him'. Isn't that the definition of exoneration in an innocent until proven guilty system? Even in civil matters a judgement is reached. Here's some of the highlights I found interesting: This is the unfortunate outcome of the investigation, and where Mueller did the country a total disservice. At the same time, the President has unnecessarily exacerbated the condition. What a shame. thehill.com/opinion/white-house/439529-the-lesson-of-mueller-an-innocent-mans-defense-can-look-like-a-guilty |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Apr 18, 2019 10:29:08 GMT -8
"We don't like how the President reacted to being falsely accused of treason" is not going to hold up in the court of public opinion as a pretext for further investigations. Only in the deranged minds of hard-Left activists could protesting one's innocence be construed as a proof of guilt.
Now it's time to investigate the phony origins of this entire hoax.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Apr 18, 2019 10:43:16 GMT -8
Best moment of this morning's press conference was when Barr wrecked this reporter's attempt to make him look biased.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Apr 18, 2019 10:45:21 GMT -8
"We don't like how the President reacted to being falsely accused of treason" is not going to hold up in the court of public opinion as a pretext for further investigations. Only in the deranged minds of hard-Left activists could protesting one's innocence be construed as a proof of guilt.And for this, let me direct your attention "over there". Right on cue... "The report confirms everything we have been talking about" |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Apr 18, 2019 11:13:16 GMT -8
Providential, I'd say....
|
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorFate on Apr 18, 2019 15:33:52 GMT -8
"We don't like how the President reacted to being falsely accused of treason" is not going to hold up in the court of public opinion as a pretext for further investigations. Only in the deranged minds of hard-Left activists could protesting one's innocence be construed as a proof of guilt. A re-run of the Kavanaugh hearings, where they claimed that his reaction to being called a rapist, made him unqualified to be a Supreme Court Justice, and somehow indicated that he was guilty of being a rapist. |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Apr 19, 2019 7:16:11 GMT -8
You wouldn't draw that conclusion this is "over" by reading the headlines. Seems they are drawing the exact opposite conclusions. What a shock! Bick’s right: This isn’t over. the Butt-hurt Democrats are now channeling Mueller’s dead investigation, claiming Trump obstructed Justice. My own Senator, What-a-Dick Durbin has tweeted it is up to the American public to decide if Trump obstructed Justice. So here’s what I don’t understand: There was no “justice” associated with the Mueller investigation, at all, so how could it be possible for Trump (or anyone) to obstruct it? Nancy Pelosi was ardently defending the Mueller investigation in the beginning. “We must accept the findings of this investigation” ... which she and Schumer, now, do not accept. |
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Apr 19, 2019 7:40:32 GMT -8
This is a classic, classic example of the ends justifying the means, in the minds of Democrats. The first end is to remove Trump from office. The second is to deny him a second term. And "by any means necessary" has never been a more accurate term than in this case. The hell with actually legislating. The goal is to screw Trump, and they'll be damned if they're going to veer from that path. Look for a constant stream of rumors, innuendos, accusations, "investigations" and inflammatory rhetoric from now until this thing ends, be it 2020 or 2024.
|
|
