Bick
Administrator 
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 11, 2019 9:00:40 GMT -8
Nice to see some serious pushback on Twitter by pretty much everyone.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 11, 2019 10:08:42 GMT -8
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 11, 2019 10:10:13 GMT -8
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on Sept 11, 2019 14:05:28 GMT -8
When she said that I took it to mean that she was implying that it was unclear who did what, as though she were one of those it-was-an-inside-job conspiracy people.
There were a couple of those guys on the old Student Sports board............................Luca
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 12, 2019 8:33:20 GMT -8
In fairness to the conspiracy theorists, I still haven't seen the crash into the pentagon that makes much sense.
It would have had to have flown parallel at about 50 ft above ground for quite a distance, yet was somehow not detected at any point.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 12, 2019 8:42:02 GMT -8
In fairness to the conspiracy theorists, I still haven't seen the crash into the pentagon that makes much sense. It would have had to have flown parallel at about 50 ft above ground for quite a distance, yet was somehow not detected at any point. Conspiracy folks claim the videos of the plane exploding as it hits the pentagon does NOT show a plane in any of the frames, leading up to or during the explosion. but if there was no plane, how did parts of a plane suddenly appear out in the parking lot and surrounding? |
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 12, 2019 10:47:43 GMT -8
Probably best to ask a conspiracy theorist.
Just seems odd that I haven't read a single account of someone saying "that plane seems to be flying awfully low to the ground.
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on Sept 12, 2019 12:39:44 GMT -8
It wasn't a plane, Bick. It was one of those black helicopters. And the reason nobody saw it is because it had a cloaking device developed by DARPA and handed over to a gang of Zionists by order of George Bush, who was controlled by the International Jewish Conspiracy.
That served as cover to initiate a war against the Islamic world, which would benefit the international arms merchants.
(It all makes sense to me except for one thing: If the helicopter has a cloaking device, why does it need to be black?)
If you are woke to the conspiracy, like me, answer this message in pig Latin so no one can understand it and I'll introduce you to the guys. Maybe even show you the secret handshake............Uca-La
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Sept 12, 2019 12:46:35 GMT -8
Hillary did it.
Vince Foster, Seth Rich.....the Pentagon.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 12, 2019 17:27:37 GMT -8
It wasn't a plane, Bick. It was one of those black helicopters. And the reason nobody saw it is because it had a cloaking device developed by DARPA and handed over to a gang of Zionists by order of George Bush, who was controlled by the International Jewish Conspiracy. That served as cover to initiate a war against the Islamic world, which would benefit the international arms merchants. (It all makes sense to me except for one thing: If the helicopter has a cloaking device, why does it need to be black?) If you are woke to the conspiracy, like me, answer this message in pig Latin so no one can understand it and I'll introduce you to the guys. Maybe even show you the secret handshake............Uca-La I SAW those in the Conspiracy Theory after reading one of my copies of Catcher in the Rye |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Sept 12, 2019 19:25:49 GMT -8
In fairness to the conspiracy theorists, I still haven't seen the crash into the pentagon that makes much sense. It would have had to have flown parallel at about 50 ft above ground for quite a distance, yet was somehow not detected at any point. Conspiracy folks claim the videos of the plane exploding as it hits the pentagon does NOT show a plane in any of the frames, leading up to or during the explosion. but if there was no plane, how did parts of a plane suddenly appear out in the parking lot and surrounding? That lone tape of the plane "hitting" the Pentagon was released a few days ago. The irreconcilable problem for conspiracy theorists is this: if the Pentagon was not actually hit by the plane, what the heck happened to that flight and everyone on it? At the same time, I find it exceedingly strange that there doesn't seem to exist any clearer surveillance tape of the plane flying into what might be the most heavily videotaped building in America. How could there not have been at least a dozen video cameras continuously trained on all sides of the Pentagon 24/7 on September 11, 2001? |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 13, 2019 5:27:53 GMT -8
Conspiracy folks claim the videos of the plane exploding as it hits the pentagon does NOT show a plane in any of the frames, leading up to or during the explosion. but if there was no plane, how did parts of a plane suddenly appear out in the parking lot and surrounding? That lone tape of the plane "hitting" the Pentagon was released a few days ago. The irreconcilable problem for conspiracy theorists is this: if the Pentagon was not actually hit by the plane, what the heck happened to that flight and everyone on it? At the same time, I find it exceedingly strange that there doesn't seem to exist any clearer surveillance tape of the plane flying into what might be the most heavily videotaped building in America. How could there not have been at least a dozen video cameras continuously trained on all sides of the Pentagon 24/7 on September 11, 2001? The unsubstantiated rumor I heard (from the same conspiracy folks who claim there was Semtex found in the ruins of the WTC, and explosions heard when WTC 7 fell) is that all video footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon was confiscated by those investigating. |
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 13, 2019 6:34:15 GMT -8
I haven't spent any time at all with WTC 7. I didn't think it was hit by anything.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Sept 13, 2019 7:04:50 GMT -8
That lone tape of the plane "hitting" the Pentagon was released a few days ago. The irreconcilable problem for conspiracy theorists is this: if the Pentagon was not actually hit by the plane, what the heck happened to that flight and everyone on it? At the same time, I find it exceedingly strange that there doesn't seem to exist any clearer surveillance tape of the plane flying into what might be the most heavily videotaped building in America. How could there not have been at least a dozen video cameras continuously trained on all sides of the Pentagon 24/7 on September 11, 2001? The unsubstantiated rumor I heard (from the same conspiracy folks who claim there was Semtex found in the ruins of the WTC, and explosions heard when WTC 7 fell) is that all video footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon was confiscated by those investigating. I guess my question would be: why wouldn't the government simply swat away the conspiracy theories by releasing a couple of clips that clearly show the plane approaching and then striking the building? Perhaps all the videos were just wiped clean... .like with a cloth or something?
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on Sept 13, 2019 8:09:39 GMT -8
There is film of the Pentagon getting hit. It’s on YouTube from a ground camera probably intended to monitor entry gates. Which means it wasn’t designed to catch a jetliner at 500 mph in slo mo. There are eye witnesses that saw a jet.
Why is it that people think we have to have Hollywood quality high definition 5000 frames/second videos of everything to prove that what is obvious actually happened? ....................Luca
|
|
