MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Oct 16, 2019 21:32:33 GMT -8
RSM/RPW, that is a gross visual that I can never unsee. I'm just thankful she doesn't have her tongue jammed into her cheek.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 16, 2019 22:16:51 GMT -8
Call me crazy but I'm starting to think this whole impeachment thing is an attempt by Democrats to interfere in the 2020 election.....
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 17, 2019 3:40:57 GMT -8
Ok, you're batshit crazy.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Oct 17, 2019 5:50:46 GMT -8
 This picture is a screen grab from the worst porno ever made...I thought that was the look she had when she realized nothing born of her hatred for Trump has come to fruition. |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Oct 17, 2019 9:00:28 GMT -8
This just in from Nancy Pelosi, when asked if she would just let the voters decide if Trump goes on past 2020:
ClearLy the woman’s Alzheimer’s is more advanced than we thought.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Oct 17, 2019 9:07:30 GMT -8
I'm sure in her ever more addled brain, what she said made perfect sense.
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on Oct 18, 2019 13:07:22 GMT -8
The Constitution is more than vague, it's almost silent on how to proceed with impeachment and with the justification for it.
All I'm seeing right now is collective and accelerating hysteria regarding that which never happened (Russian collusion and its "obstruction of justice") and that which we don't know very much about (the President's phone call with the Ukrainian leader). Added to the initial hysteria when Donald Trump was elected president in the first place.
Without putting too fine a point on it, it would be helpful before holding any vote to know what the hell is being voted on and why................................Luca
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 18, 2019 14:19:07 GMT -8
The Constitution is more than vague, it's almost silent on how to proceed with impeachment and with the justification for it. All I'm seeing right now is collective and accelerating hysteria regarding that which never happened (Russian collusion and its "obstruction of justice") and that which we don't know very much about (the President's phone call with the Ukrainian leader). Added to the initial hysteria when Donald Trump was elected president in the first place. Without putting too fine a point on it, it would be helpful before holding any vote to know what the hell is being voted on and why................................Luca Remember, Nancy Pelosi is the same woman who said of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) in March 2010: "We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It." Sounds like she's employing the same strategy with impeachment. We need to impeach Trump so that we can find out why he needs to be impeached.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 21, 2019 14:23:51 GMT -8
The longer this drags out the less likely it will happen. They have no case.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 22, 2019 19:34:04 GMT -8
Democrats spent the day soiling themselves over Trump's use of the term "lynching" to describe the current impeachment fiasco. Below is a reality check. Trump knew exactly that they had previously used "lynching" to describe Clinton's impeachment in 1998--and he just exposed their hypocrisy once again on a national stage.
Oh, and to which party did actual lynch mobs in America belong? The Democrats!
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 23, 2019 6:21:38 GMT -8
Actually, they spent the day listening to yet another of trump's "best people" describe how the president sold out our foreign policy for personal gain...but I understand why you wouldn't want to mention that, what with the wheels coming off the investigation last week and all... Dramatic deposition rocks Trump's impeachment defenseThe top US diplomat in Ukraine notified House investigators that he was told that the release of military aid to Kiev would depend on a pledge to probe the 2016 election and 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, who, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, leads Trump by 10 points in a hypothetical 2020 general election matchup.
The deposition by Bill Taylor on Tuesday appears to directly refute the President's claim that there was no quid pro quo in his dealings with the former Soviet state.www.cnn.com/2019/10/23/politics/donald-trump-impeachment-ukraine-testimony/index.htmlBut now you can get back to discussing how the democrats are hypocrites...since the topic of this thread seems to be too much for you to handle. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 23, 2019 6:23:51 GMT -8
Well, up til now the case has mostly been made by the blundering idiots in the WH, so I'd say that the longer it goes on the stronger the case gets.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Oct 23, 2019 7:24:21 GMT -8
Those episodes where democrats have used/done the same things of which they accuse others is de rigueur for them. They do not respond when shown they said or did the same thing, and they continue to do it as if part of a larger plan (something akin to “do what I say, not what I do”).
We see it here, as well.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 23, 2019 19:55:35 GMT -8
Bill Taylor is yet another person with zero first-hand knowledge of the communications between President Trump and President Zelinskyy. All we have to do is read the transcript of their call, as well as Zelinskyy's own words. If Bill Taylor doesn't like the way Trump is conducting foreign policy then he should quit and/or run for President himself. Mr. Taylor also happens to be heavily connected to a Ukrainian NGO funded by....you guessed it--Burisma!, the corrupt natural gas firm that bought off V.P. Biden through his freeloading son. No conflict of interest or anything. But we wouldn't know about that since Adam Schiff is conducting his phony impeachment inquiry in secret, with selected leaks to the press designed to advance his narrative. The Ukraine "scandal" is Russia 2.0 and Trump-haters will be equally disappointed in the outcome.
And what exactly is the crime that Trump is supposedly guilty of? When Bill Clinton was impeached the charges were perjury to a grand jury and obstruction of justice, charges which his Democratic defenders never even tried to deny. Is there a statute or provision of the Constitution that Trump is alleged to have violated in regards to Ukraine? Because I haven't heard of one being put forward.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 23, 2019 21:33:27 GMT -8
I just read Bill Taylor' actual 15-page statement and I see no law broken and not a single word about the 2020 campaign from President Trump. Now Joe Biden threatening to withhold $1B in aid unless Ukraine fires it's Chief Prosecutor (who happened to be investigating Burisma) DOES sound like a quid pro quo. The Democrats seem to be upset that A.G. Bill Barr is investigating the DNC's cooperation with Ukraine to damage Trump's candidacy, which cooperation was openly reported by Politico in January 2017.
|
|
