Bick
Administrator 
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Dec 21, 2019 22:05:35 GMT -8
Judicial Watch is like a bulldog.
|
|
SK80
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 7,376
|
Post by SK80 on Dec 22, 2019 7:42:53 GMT -8
Tweet from Juanita Broaddrick... think she has a bone to pick!  |
|
|
|
Post by coach on Dec 22, 2019 16:21:21 GMT -8
Tweet from Juanita Broaddrick... think she has a bone to pick! Wow! Posting a picture the loser and Vile's queen! Frightful criminal. May want to look into any her of latest communications regarding Epstein. |
|
|
|
Post by coach on Dec 22, 2019 16:22:26 GMT -8
Tweet from Juanita Broaddrick... think she has a bone to pick! Ive known for year he raped her. She told Lisa Meyers on MSLSD in the 90's on the same night they aired the Grammys. Ahole media!!!!! |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Dec 23, 2019 7:04:58 GMT -8
Tweet from Juanita Broaddrick... think she has a bone to pick! Indeed she does, and she has a hardened heart towards the Clintoons, too. however, that alone doesn’t invalidate information she might present... all information should still be properly reviewed for accuracy. at worst, Brodericks “history” with the Clintoons only calls into question why she posts the information... if the information is valid, it is valid whether or not Juanita Broderick presents it. |
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Dec 23, 2019 8:39:53 GMT -8
Tweet from Juanita Broaddrick... think she has a bone to pick! She told Lisa Meyers on MSLSD in the 90's on the same night they aired the Grammys. Ahole media!!!!! No. You don't. You weren't there. |
|
|
|
Post by coach on Dec 23, 2019 9:31:41 GMT -8
Ive known for year he raped her. She told Lisa Meyers on MSLSD in the 90's on the same night they aired the Grammys. Ahole media!!!!! No. You don't. You weren't there. I believe her. Lots of people in Arkansas knows about it. There are people that refuse to believe it. He's rape other women and that all have the same story. |
|
|
|
Post by coach on Dec 23, 2019 9:57:33 GMT -8
BTW, don't make me research all the names of the women he has sexually assaulted. Everybody forgets about Betsy Wright and the Bimbo Eruption and she and hiLIARy attacked women that came out against him. They hired Jack Palladino to threaten the women.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Dec 23, 2019 11:39:21 GMT -8
No. You don't. You weren't there. I believe her. And that's the problem. Believing what someone says is not the same as knowing it to be true. Too many people believe the people they like, or believe what they want to believe, while dismissing the people they don't like, or what they don't want to believe. We've become a nation of people that respond emotionally rather than rationally to what we hear, and that response is too often based solely on our political biases. |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Dec 23, 2019 12:48:34 GMT -8
And that's the problem. Believing what someone says is not the same as knowing it to be true. Too many people believe the people they like, or believe what they want to believe, while dismissing the people they don't like, or what they don't want to believe. We've become a nation of people that respond emotionally rather than rationally to what we hear, and that response is too often based solely on our political biases. I think you’re dissecting the meaning of words too finely. in my opinion, one can, indeed, know something because they believe it... a court might require a belief standard “behind a reasonable doubt,” but the rest of us are human and, quite possibly, have a different standard, for better or worse. But, now that I mention it, even beyond a reasonable doubt is possible to,be a belief by which one knows... |
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Dec 23, 2019 14:12:18 GMT -8
I think you’re dissecting the meaning of words too finely. I disagree. Devoutly religious people might think that believing and knowing are almost identical, but in the secular world they're not. Believing the accusers of Bill Clinton while disbelieving the accusers of Brett Kavanaugh is a matter of personal preference and political persuasion (how's that for alliteration?) In these matter of he said/she said, it's impossible to know if either group of accusers is telling the truth or not without having been there. |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Dec 23, 2019 15:02:42 GMT -8
There s a lot more to it than simply believing Clinton’s accusers versus Kavanaughs accusers. Has to do with credibility.
There is also a lot more to faith , but no need to get into that, here.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Dec 23, 2019 15:40:58 GMT -8
There s a lot more to it than simply believing Clinton’s accusers versus Kavanaughs accusers. Has to do with credibility.And credibility is also in the eye of the beholder. What makes some of the skanks that accused Clinton more credible than Christine Blasey Ford...except that Coach wants them to be. |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Dec 24, 2019 10:12:58 GMT -8
There s a lot more to it than simply believing Clinton’s accusers versus Kavanaughs accusers. Has to do with credibility.And credibility is also in the eye of the beholder. What makes some of the skanks that accused Clinton more credible than Christine Blasey Ford...except that Coach wants them to be. I agree, credibility IS in the eye of the beholder... so you cannot say anyone other than you cannot “know.” |
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Dec 25, 2019 13:30:52 GMT -8
I think you’re dissecting the meaning of words too finely. Believing the accusers of Bill Clinton while disbelieving the accusers of Brett Kavanaugh is a matter of personal preference and political persuasion (how's that for alliteration?) ... The above statement ignores reality & common sense. Clinton lied under oath about Monica Lewinsky & then admitted it only when there was evidence that he lied. He has impeached himself (pun intended) as far as being credible. There are multiple witnesses who back up the stories of the various accusers, people who have nothing to gain from their testimony. On the other hand, Kavanaugh's main accuser has 0 witnesses to back up her story, including those who she claims were there. His two other accusers were shown to be lying by independent sources. His situation was one where one person lied and the other two swore to it. There is no way those two situations can be said to be equal and the only difference is partisan judgement. |
|
