|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 2, 2021 9:34:18 GMT -8
The point that I was making is that the Democrats were looking to impeach President Trump on his FIRST day in office. Are you trying to deny that? Yes, as stated I deny it...no doubt there was someone somewhere who wanted to impeach trump on his first day in office, and they may even have been democrats, but no THE Democrats as a group were not involved. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, but trying to convince me that the democrats as an organization did something based on a news report about a few individuals isn't going to work very well. |
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Aug 2, 2021 9:45:55 GMT -8
You didn't read the Washington Post article. It was a Democratic sponsored group and you're trying to mince words again when you're wrong. You never change, if you can't admit you were wrong on an obvious point like this. But after all this time, I knew that. Move on VP, even better yet, please go away.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 3, 2021 3:30:31 GMT -8
You didn't read the Washington Post article. It was a Democratic sponsored group and you're trying to mince words again when you're wrong. You never change, if you can't admit you were wrong on an obvious point like this. But after all this time, I knew that. Move on VP, even better yet, please go away. I read the entire article which is why I know it doesn't support your earlier claims. You claimed that Mr. Schumer promised to impeach trump on his first day in office and so far have provided no evidence to back up that claim. You can pretend I wasn't convinced you were right because as you put it I "never change", but in actuality it's because you provided zero evidence that your claims have any validity. Your claim now is that this obscure group who called for trump's impeachment on day one is a "Democratic sponsored" group...whatever that means. In what way are they "sponsored" by the Democratic Party? Do you know? Do you have even the vaguest notion or are you just saying things that sound incriminating? No doubt you'd like me to go away and stop questioning your wild assertions, but I like it here...the arguments are usually very easy to refute. Carry on.  |
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Aug 3, 2021 7:13:29 GMT -8
Nice try VP. Another swing and a miss. My point was that the Democrats were pushing for Trumps impeachment on his first day in office. And we both know they were. Not a wild assertion at all. Please continue to look at my other items I listed and try to tell me they aren't true either.
|
|
billb
Senior Eminence Grise
Posts: 3,084
|
Post by billb on Aug 3, 2021 10:34:31 GMT -8
Nice try VP. Another swing and a miss. My point was that the Democrats were pushing for Trumps impeachment on his first day in office. Even more disturbing are the Democrat minions who were vocal advocates of getting up in the face of Trump supporters and members of the administration. Were they advocating violence? I think so. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 3, 2021 11:56:00 GMT -8
Nice try VP. Another swing and a miss. My point was that the Democrats were pushing for Trumps impeachment on his first day in office. And we both know they were. Your point is just as unsupported by evidence as the first time you made the claim. No, we don't both "know" that your unfounded assertion is true. I will say it's convenient for you that you don't get very specific...what else do you believe "the Democrats" have done? I wonder if your vagueness works against you as well as it works for you...maybe you could tell me why the Republicans believe all the white supremacist nonsense put forward by The Proud Boys? After all the Proud Boys supported trump so they must be Republicans and all Republicans believe the same things...don't they? Well, maybe not...but you do see how silly your argument is don't you? |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 3, 2021 11:58:50 GMT -8
Nice try VP. Another swing and a miss. My point was that the Democrats were pushing for Trumps impeachment on his first day in office. Even more disturbing are the Democrat minions who were vocal advocates of getting up in the face of Trump supporters and members of the administration. Were they advocating violence? I think so. Even more disturbing were the trump supporters who actually committed violence at our nation's capitol...I think that's much worse than possibly "advocating" violence. |
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Aug 3, 2021 12:07:15 GMT -8
Wow, I totally forgot about BLM and ANTIFA, both left leaning organizations that actually destroyed cities,, contributed to loss of life, and costs millions in damages…
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Aug 3, 2021 12:21:59 GMT -8
Same old, same old, VP. You won't admit how disgusting and illegal the Democrats responses were from start to finish of the Trump Presidency. No surprise there. The Biden Administration after 6 months is a disaster, but they still have your support. WTG VP.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 3, 2021 13:04:08 GMT -8
Same old, same old, VP. You won't admit how disgusting and illegal the Democrats responses were from start to finish of the Trump Presidency. No surprise there. The Biden Administration after 6 months is a disaster, but they still have your support. WTG VP. This is the first time you've mentioned how disgusting and illegal the Democrats responses have been from start to finish so I don't see how I could possibly have 'admitted' it sooner but now that you have brought it up I'll just say that your statement is so vague as to be unanswerable. You haven't done anything to counter my accusations of rampant racism by the Republicans either...see how that works? BTW, the Biden administration is not a disaster despite all your hand-wringing...you should do what you demanded we do when your guy was elected...give him a chance. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 3, 2021 13:06:25 GMT -8
Wow, I totally forgot about BLM and ANTIFA, both left leaning organizations that actually destroyed cities,, contributed to loss of life, and costs millions in damages… Really? Which cities were destroyed? If your point is so good why do you have to engage in all the hyperbole and exaggerations? Why all the stupid lies? |
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Aug 3, 2021 13:31:32 GMT -8
Unbelievable! About 19 lives were lost and millions and millions in damages. Hyperbole and exaggerations would apply to Pelosi's Jan. 6th sham. What cities? You need to come out of your Liberal bubble.
I was wondering how long it would take you to play the race card.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oakley on Aug 3, 2021 15:10:28 GMT -8
vilepagan, please give examples of rampant Republican racism.
|
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Aug 3, 2021 15:25:19 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 3, 2021 17:26:43 GMT -8
Unbelievable! About 75 lives were lost and millions and millions in damages. Hyperbole and exaggerations would apply to Pelosi's Jan. 6th sham. What cities? You need to come out of your Liberal bubble. I was wondering how long it would take you to play the race card. Unbelievable indeed, you run from the question yet again...you guys make a claim, I call you on it and you run from the question...which cities were destroyed? That was the claim, that "cities" were "destroyed"...can you name one city that was destroyed? No...so you pretend you didn't make the claim, and try to change the subject yet again. Again I ask, if you have such a valid point why do you have to lie so annoyingly often? |
|
