|
Post by Foggy on Nov 19, 2020 14:00:29 GMT -8
Whoa, 1 - 31 so far in court. He was right, he really did get tired of winning so much, huh?
Time for the crybaby president to wipe his widdle nose and try acting like a grownup for a few minutes, maybe.
Oh wait, he can't.
Never mind.
|
|
tarmac
Senior Statesman
Posts: 859
|
Post by tarmac on Nov 19, 2020 14:24:13 GMT -8
Update 11/19/2020
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 19, 2020 15:01:59 GMT -8
Foggy, citing a writer from a newspaper that's been wrong on almost every story about Trump for the past four years as an argument against Trump is, let's say, less than persuasive.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but there are some very troubling and unexplained facts about this election that the media and the Left have studiously ignored. Their preferred go-to is that any assertions of fraud or inexplicable anomalies have already been "debunked" (by whom?), without even attempting to address them.
We all know the media's narrative by now: Biden won and won decisively (how that happened--in the face of all historical indicators to the contrary--no one wants to venture to explain). I challenge any fair-minded person to examine the anomalies detailed in the link to the article below and still walk away thinking nothing suspicious is afoot. I don't think it's possible, and if the places were reversed I'd be calling for a full examination. Cheating to win is always wrong and can only do grave damage to civil society. Dismissing the possibility out of hand is not to the benefit of anyone.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Nov 19, 2020 15:30:16 GMT -8
Well Foggy, And you of course you believe the WaPo is unbiased. Right...................the same rag which pushed Russia Collusion, knowing all along it was a lie. Among many, many other false claims.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 19, 2020 15:42:36 GMT -8
Well Foggy, And you of course you believe the WaPo is unbiased. Right...................the same rag which pushed Russia Collusion, knowing all along it was a lie. Among many, many other false claims. Same newspaper that pushed the idea that Brett Kavanaugh was a gang rapist, Nicholas Sandmann bullied a Native American, and Jussie Smollett was attacked by MAGA in the streets of Chicago at 3:00am. Credibility: ZERO
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 19, 2020 23:55:10 GMT -8
Whoa, 1 - 31 so far in court. He was right, he really did get tired of winning so much, huh? Time for the crybaby president to wipe his widdle nose and try acting like a grownup for a few minutes, maybe. My favorite part about this post is that it included a tweet from none other than Marc Elias, the Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer who helped funnel money to Christopher Steele for his phony dossier that roiled the nation for three years. There's almost nobody sleazier in American politics. That he's now spearheading the DNC and Biden campaign's attempt to steal this election makes perfect sense. Birds of a feather....
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 20, 2020 0:07:42 GMT -8
Sidney Powell is fearless and has an impeccable track record of taking on government corruption.
Great article by John Zmirak. If Dominion sues for libel, that opens them up to discovery (which I suspect they would want to avoid); if they don't sue their company is finished.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 20, 2020 0:18:11 GMT -8
Nothing suspicious about these ballot dumps....
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 20, 2020 4:17:05 GMT -8
Nothing suspicious about these ballot dumps.... No there isn't anything suspicious about them. I understand you think these "suspicions" are "evidence" but no judge will agree with you.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 20, 2020 4:21:39 GMT -8
Foggy, citing a writer from a newspaper that's been wrong on almost every story about Trump for the past four years as an argument against Trump is, let's say, less than persuasive. How about Tucker Carlson? He wants to see some of this evidence too, but Sidney Powell is keeping it to herself for some reason...
|
|
|
Post by Foggy on Nov 20, 2020 6:10:03 GMT -8
Well, the Trumpanzees won another ruling yesterday, regarding fewer than 2,500 votes that don't change anything. But, credit where credit is due: They finished the day yesterday 2 - 32 in legal rulings, and Biden still leads in the electoral vote, 306 to 232. Winning! Rudy G. and Jenna Ellis and Sidney Powell put on a batshit-insane shitshow yesterday, with Rudy's hair dye leaking down his face. When the reporters asked for some evidence - ANY evidence - to support his loony claim of massive election fraud, he said it was the media's job to find it. Sure, Jan. Yeah, that's how it works. On some planet in a galaxy too far away to be seen with telescopes, maybe. Privately, Trump and Rudy admit, the only hope for them stealing the election is to convince state legislatures in swing states to fuck over the voters and install Trump electors. In other words, they're blatantly trying to subvert and destroy the American system of democracy. It's Trump vs. Reality and American democracy in a smackdown cage match TO THE DEATH. Which is how you know that anyone who still supports the criminal minimind in the White House is a fucking traitor to this great nation. On the bright side, Reality and American democracy are kicking his fat ass, 2 - 32 so far. How will Rudy G. manage to make an even more insane appearance today than he did yesterday? A horrified nation gapes in amazement as the criminals flail and debase themselves. Even Tucker Carlson figured out, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF FRAUD. Biden won by 6 million votes, and Trump is swirling down the toilet.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Nov 20, 2020 7:42:19 GMT -8
Evidence is presented to a Judge. Not to a media which has proven itself to be an arm of the DNC. We've put up with your Schiff Show for almost 5 years. You can hang in there for a couple of more weeks. The media is more concerned about Rudy's hair dye than the Dems cheating during an election......
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Nov 20, 2020 8:02:10 GMT -8
Rudy G. and Jenna Ellis and Sidney Powell put on a batshit-insane shitshow yesterday, with Rudy's hair dye leaking down his face. When the reporters asked for some evidence - ANY evidence - to support his loony claim of massive election fraud, he said it was the media's job to find it. Sure, Jan. Yeah, that's how it works.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Nov 20, 2020 8:10:34 GMT -8
Rudy G. and Jenna Ellis and Sidney Powell put on a batshit-insane shitshow yesterday, with Rudy's hair dye leaking down his face. When the reporters asked for some evidence - ANY evidence - to support his loony claim of massive election fraud, he said it was the media's job to find it. Sure, Jan. Yeah, that's how it works. Well actually, that is how it's supposed to work. The media should be looking into this. They've ignored Obama spying on the Trump Administration, Hillary's emails, Who ordered and paid for the Steele Dossier, Fisa abuse, the phony Russian Collusion, the phony impeachment, Hunter Biden pay to play scandal, Joe Biden getting paid off by Russia, Ukraine, and China, the phony charges on General Flynn, and on and on and on. How does a person who can barely put together 2 sentences, who can't draw more than a dozen people to a campaign event, who hid in his home basement for the length of his campaign to avoid scrutiny, suddenly receive in the middle of the night hundreds of thousands of votes in swing states, and receive more votes than Obama did when he ran? Someone in the media might actually win a Pulitzer if they wanted to look into this.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Nov 20, 2020 8:23:56 GMT -8
. Even Tucker Carlson figured out, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF FRAUD. Tucker wanted to get an exclusive, and was turned down. Powell will present evidence to a Judge. For you to actually write there is no evidence of fraud, shows how biased you are. There's plenty of evidence, but is it enough to overturn these election results? We'll have to see when they present it to a Judge.
|
|