davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Oct 1, 2019 4:45:11 GMT -8
Let me guess. You're going to tell me some nonsense about how it's ok to lie if you're a true Christian? I've seen the video from the Russia Times. I'm sorry to inform you it doesn't say what you think it says. It's not an admission of wrongdoing on Biden's part despite your fevered hopes. I'm not going to waste my time debunking a theory that has been thoroughly debunked by the press already. If you wish to believe what the Russians are selling you, go right ahead. It doesn't surprise me one bit that you guys buy into this idiotic idea. Several things, Homey... first, I knew it was only a matter of time before you would have to respond to my post, and just so you’re clear, simply removing my name from my quote doesn’t count as ignoring me. Second, I was also pretty sure you would make some kind of inane comment to Biden’s actual words that what we heard was not what we heard. Third, I’m not sure why you, of all people would defend Biden... most homosexuals with whom I’m acquainted will not rise to the defense of a pedophile: I had the impression even reprobates had their standards, but you’ve proven me wrong. Well done. Tell Brad he owes you a raise. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 1, 2019 8:46:52 GMT -8
Definitely not your homey.
I knew you were desperate for me to respond to you so I thought I would throw you a bone...I'm giving that way.
Except that's not what I said is it...you heard the same thing I heard, but you interpreted it all wrong. I hope that's not too inane for you to understand.
I didn't mean to defend Biden, I meant to attack your stupid post. Sorry for the confusion.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Oct 1, 2019 9:37:45 GMT -8
Definitely not your homey. I knew you were desperate for me to respond to you so I thought I would throw you a bone...I'm giving that way. Except that's not what I said is it...you heard the same thing I heard, but you interpreted it all wrong. I hope that's not too inane for you to understand. I didn't mean to defend Biden, I meant to attack your stupid post. Sorry for the confusion. HA HA HA HA HA HA... got you again, Homey. You’re just too easy.  |
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,305
|
Post by Luca on Oct 1, 2019 13:03:26 GMT -8
You claimed that the investigation of trump for "collusion" was unnecessary because trump was falsely accused...correct? How would we have known he was falsely accused without the investigation? Once a false accusation is made and given credence by presumed impartial official sources who submit false information to support the accusation, then it does have to be investigated. My point is that it was wrong in the first place to introduce accusations based on false information. The investigation of Donald Trump was for this reason not justified . It was you who drew the comparison to Hillary Clinton. It is widely known - as you admit – that she did use her private server to conduct State Department business, which is contrary to regulations. The investigation as to whether by handling classified information on it she committed a crime did not result in criminal charges. But she did violate State Department regulations by using that server and that is what justified her investigation...............................Luca |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 1, 2019 22:29:02 GMT -8
White House Senior Policy Adviser, Stephan Miller, appears on Fox Business with Lou Dobbs to explain the apoplexy coming from DC’s administrative state. Miller outlines the deep fear held by many in the professional political class in/around DC toward ongoing investigations by U.S. AG Bill Barr and U.S. Attorney John Durham. (courtesy of The Last Refuge)
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 2, 2019 20:31:47 GMT -8
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 2, 2019 20:33:23 GMT -8
Talk about back-tracking.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 2, 2019 20:36:07 GMT -8
Trump tweets photo of Joe and Hunter Biden posing before a round of golf with a Ukrainian gas executive that worked with Hunter. Joe is toast.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Oct 3, 2019 6:55:17 GMT -8
“How would we know he was falsely accused without the investigation?”
This is a classically liberal, tortured and circular logic (or pretense there at).
The investigation raised the (false) accusation in the public’s mind. The investigation, given that Those who raised it in the first place KNEW it was false, served a purpose only to the democrats and specifically not to the general public in any sense.
We did not need an investigation to know the accusation was false: without an investigation, this accusation would simply die as do all such false accusations.
|
|
SK80
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 7,349
|
Post by SK80 on Oct 3, 2019 7:01:02 GMT -8
again a game played by the left that can only take shape by compliance given to them by the media... make headlines, change minds, create collateral damage and if it doesn't pan out to be truth moves to the next story.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 3, 2019 13:10:46 GMT -8
These are the new rules:
1. All accusations against Republicans are "credible" and "must be investigated" in order to "get to the bottom of it."
2. All accusations against Democrats are "partisan attacks" and "conspiracy theories" that have already been "debunked" by multiple sources.
3. Republicans making charges against Democrats are "undermining our democracy" and should been investigated themselves for making such accusations.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 3, 2019 21:26:52 GMT -8
The wheels continue to fall off the latest coup attempt.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,282
Member is Online
|
Post by RSM789 on Oct 4, 2019 0:01:08 GMT -8
I heard a clip today where Biden was talking about the allegation of corruption by he & his son Hunter. His response included the comment "...there is zero, zero, zero evidence of any assertion being made". I found that choice of words curious.
Imagine if you were accused of rape. If you were innocent, I believe your responses would be "I didn't do it", "She's lying", "I'm innocent". I'm not sure at what point in the rape trial, your defense would change to "There is zero, zero, zero evidence of the assertion being made". That lack of denying the accusation sounds real shifty, a way to respond and try to look innocent without saying "I didn't do it". After all, there are thousands of crimes committed every year where there is zero, zero, zero evidence left behind.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 5, 2019 3:12:28 GMT -8
The impeachment inquiry is moving forward pretty well considering the wheels are coming off...btw, calling the impeachment process a "coup" shows just how little you know about our Constitution. New York Times: 2nd intelligence official might submit whistleblower complaintCNN)A second intelligence official with concerns and more direct knowledge regarding President Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine is considering filing a whistleblower complaint, The New York Times reported Friday.
The Times' report, citing two people briefed on the matter, comes as House Democrats ratchet up their impeachment inquiry centered on Trump's July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky by issuing a subpoena to the White House and a documents request to Vice President Mike Pence.www.cnn.com/2019/10/04/politics/intelligence-official-whistleblower-complaint/Just keep telling yourself there's nothing there...ROFL. |
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,282
Member is Online
|
Post by RSM789 on Oct 5, 2019 13:07:58 GMT -8
New York Times: 2nd intelligence official might submit whistleblower complaintCNN)A second intelligence official with concerns and more direct knowledge regarding President Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine is considering filing a whistleblower complaint, The New York Times reported Friday. There is a large difference between someone who is doing something & someone who might do something. For example, CNN might one day actually report news without an agenda to undermine our president. However, until they do, that does not exist. So the article & your link to it are based completely on something that does not currently exist. Solid reporting. Second, if a 2nd intelligence official who had more direct knowledge of the phone call didn't file a whistle blower complaint back when he heard it, it is pretty weak to now file one now. The logical procession should be those who are closest to the event file complaints first. By waiting, #2 (an appropriate name) looks like Julie Swetnick, nothing more than partisan piling on with no basis in fact for the accusation. Third, this is CNN reporting on a NY Times story, take anything either of them write with a grain of salt. Remember these are the folks who spent two years telling you the Trump was guilty of colluding with the Russians and they were wrong. Neither company has any journalistic scruples, they are the essence of Fake News. |
|
