Michael Flynn was set up

Last September, almost two years after bringing a charge against Michael Flynn, a 3-star Lt. General and 30 year veteran, the FBI claims the original 302 documentation of the interview with Flynn--the evidence upon which the entire case rests--is "lost." In a normal universe, that would be the moment the judge immediately dismisses the case while chewing out the state's prosecutors for wasting everyone's time. 

Judge Emmet Sullivan's reaction: Stuff happens.

Can you ask this question again in English? I have no idea what you tried to say here.



What's stopping you?

Read Section 34 of Flynn's own declaration from January.

”...Sullivan can disagree with the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, but he cannot substitute his own judgment for it.”

you're right on all counts:

1. A court superior to Sullivan’s will overturn this, regardless of the verdict that eventually comes unless it is exoneration.
2. It really does seem like he is purposefully drawing it out:  It is as if the democrats and other liberals are out of gas and this is one of their last arrows in the quiver (and COVID19 IS the last one), and
3. OF COURSE the swamp doesn’t want Flynn talking freely...

Once again, someone here continues to demonstrate any inability to distinguish fact from opinion. Facts are facts--it doesn't matter where they are mentioned (Wikipedia, NYT, op-ed piece, or a bathroom stall). Every single thing I refer to as a "fact" can be verified by anyone who has the inclination. Simply because the fact is unknown to some people or is inconvenient to their narrative doesn't make it less of a fact. 

Newsflash: Op-Ed pieces are arguments that are based on a particular person's interpretation of facts. Two people can look at the same set of facts and come to entirely different opinions. The strength of each opinion is based on the persuasiveness of their argument vis-à-vis the undisputed facts.

FACT: Hillary Clinton had 33,000 emails deleted that were under Congressional subpoena. Some people's opinion is that those were all personal emails about yoga and wedding plans. My opinion is that those emails were evidence of unethical and possibly illegal activities. The various opinions do not change the fact of the missing emails. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion; they are not entitled to their own facts.

I also notice that while there's a complaint registered here about the source of the facts I put forth as the basis of my opinions, there is no attempt to actually dispute these facts and show that they are false. If someone thinks they're not true, then stop whining about it and go ahead and disprove them. Show me where I'm wrong on the facts.

As someone here once said, "Dude, this is a place where we discuss things." If you have an opinion, then lay it out on the table. But these interminable cat-calls of "you're making stuff up" when you simple disagree with our opinions does nothing to advance the conversation.

Oh, by the way, the issue that began this dispute involves John Gleeson, the retired judge appointed by Judge Emmet Sullivan to argue against the DOJ's dismissal of Flynn's case, who only came to prominence in this matter because he wrote, wait for it......an opinion piece in the Washington Post already making that argument. So I assume we should be skeptical about the facts he puts forth to support his argument because they first appeared in an "op-ed."

www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/11/flynn-case-isnt-over-until-judge-says-its-over/

Robert Mueller framed Gen. Flynn.