|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 12, 2019 4:09:17 GMT -8
Take a remedial English class. Perhaps afterwards you won't look like an idiot.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 12, 2019 22:00:25 GMT -8
No, I'm not denying anything. The whole impeachment inquiry was launched when trump released the summary of his phone call...you know, the "transcript". He keeps telling people to read the thing as if it will exonerate him when it was that very transcript that caused the inquiry to be launched. All you're doing is repeating the stupid excuses of the president. Actually, Nancy Pelosi made her speech announcing the impeachment inquiry on Tuesday, September 24, based on her understanding of the whistleblower complaint--which hadn't even yet been made public. President Trump declassified the transcript of the phone call that same day and made it public on Wednesday, September 25. The whistleblower complaint was made public on Thursday, September 26. The so-called "inquiry" was announced by Pelosi before both the complaint and the transcript were released. It appears you have your facts wrong on this account. Look it up: www.nytimes.com/2019/09/24/us/politics/democrats-impeachment-trump.htmlHere's the transcript. www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdfThere is absolutely nothing inappropriate here. There's no "bribery." In fact, foreign aid to Ukraine was never even mentioned. There's no pressure to "dig up dirt" on Joe Biden. For God's sake, Biden is on tape bragging about leveraging $1B of American foreign aid to get a Ukrainian prosecutor fired under circumstances that stood to benefit his son. Asking the President of Ukraine to "look into it" is wholly appropriate, considering the U.S. was in the process of doling out hundreds of millions more in taxpayer funds to a country with an awful history of corruption. In fact, Trump would be derelict in his duties if he didn't inquire about this, since the United States even has a formal agreement with Ukraine to address potential corruption issues. ua.usembassy.gov/joint-statement-on-u-s-ukraine-strategic-partnership/If Biden or his son truly did nothing wrong then he should welcome a full investigation of the matter in order to completely exonerate his good name--as this was the same reason given by many on the Left as to why Trump should have welcomed the Russia Collusion investigation. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Biden doesn't get a pass against scrutiny just because he's running for President--Donald Trump certainly doesn't. The fact that Biden and Democrat-supporting media insist that any such investigation is anathema and would only serve to validate right-wing "conspiracy theories" looks like a glaring case of the gentleman doth protest too much, to paraphrase Hamlet. |
|
