duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on May 6, 2019 11:54:23 GMT -8
I have not been able to verify, which means it is probably not true... I just read, on that reliable, well documented news compendium, Facebook, that a 9th District judge has reversed Mueller conclusion and Trump is guilty of collusion. Please let me... us... know if you see anything further on this. Me thinks you're pulling our legs Dave.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on May 6, 2019 14:30:33 GMT -8
I have not been able to verify, which means it is probably not true... I just read, on that reliable, well documented news compendium, Facebook, that a 9th District judge has reversed Mueller conclusion and Trump is guilty of collusion. Please let me... us... know if you see anything further on this. Me thinks you're pulling our legs Dave. Well, I saw it on Facebook... it MUST be true.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on May 12, 2019 22:47:14 GMT -8
Rand Paul explains why most of the Mueller Report violates the norms of legal ethics. Mueller's whole purpose was to deliver a political hit-job on the President, while studiously avoiding and covering up the crimes of Obama's FBI/CIA/DOJ.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on May 21, 2019 21:40:35 GMT -8
Mueller is running scared. Deluded liberals think he's going to contradict his two-year report and provide some new testimony that somehow dooms Trump. What a joke.
I hope to God he is subpoenaed for public testimony. If so, the entire hoax will go up in flames.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on May 29, 2019 11:23:29 GMT -8
St. Robert Mueller had a garbage press conference and refuses to answer any difficult questions about his "investigation." This guy has always been a dirty cop and a fixer for the Deep State. The idea that he is a "man of integrity" is a complete joke. The guy doesn't have the stones to testify publicly and defend his own report. The only purpose of his performance today is to pour gasoline on the dying embers of impeachment.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on May 29, 2019 11:28:30 GMT -8
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on May 29, 2019 11:33:25 GMT -8
His job is not to "exonerate" anyone.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on May 29, 2019 11:40:37 GMT -8
Translation: Please please please don't subpoena me!
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on May 29, 2019 11:53:23 GMT -8
Both Mueller and Comey exemplify almost everything that's wrong with the lawyers and politicians who think they have a right to lord it over the other 300 million of us. They are weak and disgraceful excuses for manhood.
|
|
SK80
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 7,376
|
Post by SK80 on May 29, 2019 12:21:34 GMT -8
This is a major dark moment in US history.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on May 29, 2019 14:30:49 GMT -8
This is what I took from his press conference:
- His comments were more for Congress than for anyone in the room
- He made it clear if he testifies before Congress, he won’t say anything outside of what is in his report
- He made it very clear charging the president with a crime was never a consideration for his committee
- He also noted (rightly) that there is a process already in place for holding a sitting president accountable for any crimes (basically telling Congress to do its job).
- He said he wouldn’t take questions because everything he has to say is in the report.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on May 29, 2019 15:49:50 GMT -8
I believe that he didn't want to face Republicans who would have asked him a couple of questions which would show his bias: 1. How does he justify the 19 people he chose to investigate this President when they all have shown their own bias. 2. How long has he known about there not being any collusion with Russia? The clear answer is the first day of his investigation, so what was he doing for 2 1/2 years? 3. How can he use the DNC funded memo to open up FISA investigations, knowing from the start it was unverified and false? 4. How can he justify calling this an investigation, when from the start his people were leaking to the media and the Dems whatever they could to bring down a sitting President? 5. Did he look into the DNC and their collusion with Russia? 6. I could go on and on and on.
Mueller is a cowardly POS who is part of the Washington establishment which Trump was elected to clear out.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on May 29, 2019 16:05:09 GMT -8
Any democrats in agreement with any part of what is being touted here?
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on May 29, 2019 16:49:31 GMT -8
I don’t stay on top of current events as much as most of you guys. There are a lot of comments and characterizations here that I don’t understand or am unfamiliar with. But there is something in particular that I am missing in all this Mueller investigation frenzy and its aftermath.
Let’s assume that the House Democrats decide that they should try to impeach the President. Given the results from the Mueller investigation it sounds like they would try to impede him on the basis of “an inability to prove that he did not impede an investigation into a crime that never occurred.” I don’t think a significant percentage of citizens are going to feel that this qualifies as "high crimes or misdemeanors."
So there will be months of histrionics and melodramatics and speechifyin’ with every Representative wanting to have his face time on TV. And presumably if they go ahead with it it’s because they believe the motion to impeach will succeed (I would assume, since if they don’t get the motion past a Democrat controlled House of Representatives they’re going to look incompetent and impotent).
So if the impeachment motion succeeds, then what? It goes to the Senate, which is controlled by the Republicans with the Chief Justice presiding. There is not a snowball’s chance in hell that the motion would succeed in the Senate. I assume everybody already knows this.
So what’s the point? What do Democrat's expect to accomplish with all this futile sound and fury? Once the motion fails I would assume an increasing number of the citizenry are going to be pissed off that their time has been wasted for 3 or 4 years on this Hollywood narrative of a sitting US president conspiring with the Russian government to get elected.
This whole scenario seems so obviously counterintuitive that I don’t know why they are pushing for it. Does anyone have a credible rationale for it?..............................Luca
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorFate on May 29, 2019 17:01:15 GMT -8
They are blinded by their hatred for Trump, and are thinking with their black heart, instead of with their brain.
|
|