Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 11, 2020 9:23:37 GMT -8
BLM has now become the moral justification for Leftist cancel culture. You will be bullied into submission--or else.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 11, 2020 9:39:53 GMT -8
Black looters: innocent
Law abiding whites: guilty
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 11, 2020 11:41:06 GMT -8
Are you freaking kidding me? Plus this is also an attack on Latin, so I'm doubly pissed.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 11, 2020 12:08:12 GMT -8
So when are the Democrats going to apologize for slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, and opposing desegregation all the way up the 1960s?
|
|
|
|
Post by Oakley on Jun 11, 2020 12:26:10 GMT -8
No vilepagan, the point is that Mr. Floyd is seen as a martyr and the fact is that he was a career criminal who preyed on innocent people. He was in prison multiple times for different crimes. No one believes he should have been killed. His killer(s) will receive justice, but his death in no way deserves the mayhem it has created. I see. You'd be ok with the riots if he were a saint? Mr. Floyd's past is simply irrelevant. He was unjustly killed by the police and his past transgressions had nothing to do with the way he was killed. People who are keen to bring up his past are engaging in the same tactics as those who accuse rape victims of dressing in a provocative way or being in the "wrong part of town"...it's just blaming the victim. BTW. 'mayhem" is legally defined as the mutilation of a corpse. No, you don’t see. I am not okay with riots - period, no matter what the reason. Mr. Floyd’s transgressions are absolutely relevant because that was who he was and he was engaged in committing them which led to his death! He does not deserve to be a martyr; the guy was a low life career criminal. BTW, what is the point in using the word “mayhem” in a legal sense on an online forum? Also I have seen the dictionary definition as “cripple or mutilate the victim” not corpse. Everyday use of the word means chaos, anarchy, violence, confusion, etc. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Jun 12, 2020 2:40:00 GMT -8
I see. You'd be ok with the riots if he were a saint? Mr. Floyd's past is simply irrelevant. He was unjustly killed by the police and his past transgressions had nothing to do with the way he was killed. People who are keen to bring up his past are engaging in the same tactics as those who accuse rape victims of dressing in a provocative way or being in the "wrong part of town"...it's just blaming the victim. BTW. 'mayhem" is legally defined as the mutilation of a corpse. Mr. Floyd’s transgressions are absolutely relevant because that was who he was and he was engaged in committing them which led to his death! Well, I'm not as comfortable as you are in deciding that Mr. Floyd is at fault for his death...and apparently your view isn't held by many. Enjoy. |
|
Bick
Administrator 
Posts: 6,901
|
Post by Bick on Jun 12, 2020 4:20:42 GMT -8
Are you freaking kidding me? Plus this is also an attack on Latin, so I'm doubly pissed. How about the donations to mental health for all those who felt marginalized by their name? |
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Jun 12, 2020 6:44:08 GMT -8
I see. You'd be ok with the riots if he were a saint? Mr. Floyd's past is simply irrelevant. He was unjustly killed by the police and his past transgressions had nothing to do with the way he was killed. People who are keen to bring up his past are engaging in the same tactics as those who accuse rape victims of dressing in a provocative way or being in the "wrong part of town"...it's just blaming the victim. BTW. 'mayhem" is legally defined as the mutilation of a corpse. BTW, what is the point in using the word “mayhem” in a legal sense on an online forum? Also I have seen the dictionary definition as “cripple or mutilate the victim” not corpse. Everyday use of the word means chaos, anarchy, violence, confusion, etc. Yeah ah, that’s just something you have to get used to with a maladjusted buttwipe like him. He only knows news headlines from the largely complicit media so when he sees an emotionally manipulative word like that, he gloms onto it, typically, without bothering himself to find what it actually means. it is a trick he has used for years, if you can call it a trick. Mostly, it’s just liberal lunatic illiteracy. |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 15, 2020 9:38:13 GMT -8
Never apologize or give in to the crazed demands of the SJW commissars.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 15, 2020 12:49:51 GMT -8
Black history professor points out the reality that only reliance on God can solve these issues.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 15, 2020 14:26:41 GMT -8
British activist says of Winston Churchill, "I haven't personally met him." This gross ignorance is similar those in the U.S. who, in the name of racial justice, have been defacing statues of prominent abolitionists (!). They don't even know what this means but because abolitionists are dead white men and the word ends in "ist" it sounds bad and must be destroyed in an orgy of nihilistic madness.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 15, 2020 14:32:56 GMT -8
My grandparents never moved out of their neighborhoods in Inglewood and Baldwin Hills, respectively, but I guess that means they were still racists.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,287
|
Post by RSM789 on Jun 15, 2020 16:38:50 GMT -8
Is it just me, or is it beyond bizarre that the biggest hero in America, the one who has millions kneeling or bowing down in his name, was imprisoned three or four times, had traces of fentanyl, pot, meth and morphine in his system when he died, and was trying to pass counterfeit $20 bills? I think it's just you. ... Why do you try so hard to find a reason to dislike the guy? Is it necessary that we like someone to believe they were treated unjustly? What you are thinking is wrong. MDDad never said he disliked Floyd, he was just questioning why Floyd was being treated like a hero when the facts show he was just a victim, a flawed individual who made bad choices that led to his death at the hands of a corrupt cop. You have just given an example of how you often attempt to twist conversations. You create out of thin air the narrative that MDDad dislikes Floyd, apparently in an effort to make him defend why he "dislikes Floyd". There is nothing in MDDads post that even hints at liking or disliking Mr. Floyd. Why do you try so hard to try to twist what people write into something completely different? Is it necessary that you have to change the argument in order to try to win it? |
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,287
|
Post by RSM789 on Jun 15, 2020 16:58:54 GMT -8
Mr. Floyd’s transgressions are absolutely relevant because that was who he was and he was engaged in committing them which led to his death! Well, I'm not as comfortable as you are in deciding that Mr. Floyd is at fault for his death...and apparently your view isn't held by many. Enjoy. And you did it again. Oakley wrote that Floyd " was engaged in committing them (crimes) which led to his death". That is an undeniable fact, for if Mr. Floyd had not been committing the crime he did, the police never would have been called and the criminal cop never would have had the opportunity to kill him. So you ignore what Oakley actually wrote and instead claim that Oakley wrote " that Mr. Floyd is at fault for his death". Once again, you have created a narrative out of thin air, changing the course of the discussion and being completely disingenuous. Oakley neither said nor implied that Floyd was at fault for his death. Your choice to continue to misconstrue what people write is why you are such a lonely, disliked little man. Leon sweetheart, its about time you pack your bags. I am more than willing to defend your right to post your opinions here, even if they are the opposite of mine. After all, that is what this site is for, discussion in an effort to enlighten. What this forum isn't is a website for you to attempt parlor tricks and misrepresent what people write over & over. It is a scumbag move to do that and reveals your lack of intelligence to make a coherent response in an effort to influence. |
|
|
|
Post by Oakley on Jun 15, 2020 19:38:07 GMT -8
Well done RSM789, thanks.
|
|
