|
|
Post by vilepagan on Aug 31, 2020 9:54:56 GMT -8
I disagree. I could call you stupid and call it a "logical conclusion" but I don't think that would help me make my point any more than it helped you make yours. You are incorrect. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the judges decision is irrelevant. The judges actions are what is under scrutiny and based on the response from the prosecuting attorney and the appeals court, these actions are blatantly prejudicial and incorrect. That is not my opinion, that is as many on the left like to proclaim, a fact. So, based on that fact, the motive for such behavior appears to be either incompetence or corruption. There really isn't any other choice. Well, today the full Appeals Court reversed the earlier ruling by a three-judge panel and ruled 8-2 that the judge doesn't have to dismiss the case against Flynn...so what does that do to your theories? Appeals court rejects Flynn's effort to dismiss chargesA federal appeals court rejected Michael Flynn's effort to force a judge to immediately dismiss the charges against him, overturning an earlier decision that would have allowed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to drop its case against the former national security adviser.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 8-2 against Flynn's petition for it to step in and force a district judge to grant the Justice Department's motion to drop charges without holding a hearing on the issue.
The circuit court also denied Flynn's argument that the judge overseeing his case be forced to recuse himself. The former three-star general's legal team had argued that Judge Emmet Sullivan acted improperly by appointing outside counsel to argue against the DOJ's sudden decision to drop its case and by asking the full circuit court to revisit the earlier decision by a three-judge panel.thehill.com/regulation/514416-appeals-court-rejects-flynns-effort-to-dismiss-charges |
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Aug 31, 2020 12:24:59 GMT -8
More proof that the swamp needs to be drained.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 1, 2020 3:11:47 GMT -8
ROFL. If a court disagrees with you it's a swamp that needs to be drained. Good one. Excellent reasoning.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Sept 1, 2020 12:46:40 GMT -8
There's justice, and then there's the Lefts version of Justice. But I'm sure you know that.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,287
|
Post by RSM789 on Sept 1, 2020 20:30:49 GMT -8
You are incorrect. Whether one agrees or disagrees with the judges decision is irrelevant. The judges actions are what is under scrutiny and based on the response from the prosecuting attorney and the appeals court, these actions are blatantly prejudicial and incorrect. That is not my opinion, that is as many on the left like to proclaim, a fact. So, based on that fact, the motive for such behavior appears to be either incompetence or corruption. There really isn't any other choice. Well, today the full Appeals Court reversed the earlier ruling by a three-judge panel and ruled 8-2 that the judge doesn't have to dismiss the case against Flynn...so what does that do to your theories? Nothing. That ruling wasn't about the reason for the ruling by the judge, rather whether or not he had the authority to make it. He is still either incompetent or corrupt, the Appeals court didn't comment on that. They just cleared up what was under his authority. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 2, 2020 4:37:02 GMT -8
There's justice, and then there's the Lefts version of Justice. But I'm sure you know that. I know that justice is supposed to be delivered by the courts...not by disappointed politicians...you seem to like trump's views on what justice is...his justice. And I'm not at all sure you know that. |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 3, 2020 13:10:23 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 4, 2020 3:59:53 GMT -8
Wow, a picture of a guy in a Biden T-shirt...how relevant and informative.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 9, 2020 15:25:15 GMT -8
This is the same standard suggested by Joe Biden himself in a January 2017 WH meeting to investigate Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, an innocent man who remains a political prisoner of the Deep State to this very day.
These people are psychotic.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 25, 2020 17:15:14 GMT -8
Trump announced a pardon for Gen. Michael Flynn today. It never should have come to this, except for the corrupt Judge Emmett Sullivan refusing to dismiss the case that even the DOJ requested to be dropped.
Even Michael Tracey--a liberal journalist--acknowledges the travesty of Flynn's prosecution.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Nov 25, 2020 17:48:58 GMT -8
I hope that even the Left will acknowledge that this was justified.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 25, 2020 19:22:40 GMT -8
I hope that even the Left will acknowledge that this was justified. Don't hold your breath. TDS is too strong with these people. |
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Nov 25, 2020 21:03:21 GMT -8
I understand Jim Acosta on CNN had an absolute fit today. What will that publicity hound do with Biden in office?
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Nov 25, 2020 23:34:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Nov 26, 2020 11:11:15 GMT -8
I guess trump must have thought Flynn was guilty...I hope Flynn thanks him for making sure he never gets to clear his name.
|
|
