Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 28, 2020 20:45:18 GMT -8
BLM crowd (aka Democrats) trespassed into a private neighborhood in St. Louis and this couple came out to defend their property.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Jun 28, 2020 21:30:08 GMT -8
Is that couple Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, because that looks like freakin' Buckingham Palace behind them.
Furthermore, it appears the idiots they are threatening with their firearms are on a public sidewalk. If that's the case, then the couple should be arrested.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 28, 2020 22:28:52 GMT -8
Is that couple Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, because that looks like freakin' Buckingham Palace behind them. Furthermore, it appears the idiots they are threatening with their firearms are on a public sidewalk. If that's the case, then the couple should be arrested. It's a private street, not open to the public. The "protesters" were the ones posing the threat and were clearly trespassing. After a few weeks of scenes of looting, violence, and wanton destruction property--all without authorities seemingly willing to enforce the law--citizens can only count on themselves at this point. And that particular house is a mansion in a historical neighborhood. There's a photo below of the entrance to the neighborhood; the private entrance is similar to the entrance to many gated communities across the nation.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Jun 29, 2020 2:30:29 GMT -8
Yeah, we need to have the second amendment so those people can protect their mansion. You've convinced me. If that guy didn't have an AR he'd be dead right now...those protesters were out for blood.
Honestly Credo you post the most ridiculous shit from Twitter.
|
|
|
Post by Oakley on Jun 29, 2020 5:18:33 GMT -8
Yeah, we need to have the second amendment so those people can protect their mansion. You've convinced me. If that guy didn't have an AR he'd be dead right now...those protesters were out for blood. Honestly Credo you post the most ridiculous shit from Twitter. I don’t understand your attitude. Don’t you believe people have a right to protect their property? What would you do if a mob threatened to loot, vandalize or set fire to your home? Would you gladly turn it over to them? These people have shown over and over that they are not reasonable. They take great pleasure in destroying property! So what would you do?
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Jun 29, 2020 5:44:21 GMT -8
Yeah, we need to have the second amendment so those people can protect their mansion. You've convinced me. If that guy didn't have an AR he'd be dead right now...those protesters were out for blood. Honestly Credo you post the most ridiculous shit from Twitter. I don’t understand your attitude. Don’t you believe people have a right to protect their property? What would you do if a mob threatened to loot, vandalize or set fire to your home? Would you gladly turn it over to them? These people have shown over and over that they are not reasonable. They take great pleasure in destroying property! So what would you do? You mean you're not trained to know which mob will destroy your property? You really can't tell which members of the mob that breached a security gate are the peaceful ones?
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Jun 29, 2020 6:06:34 GMT -8
Is that couple Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, because that looks like freakin' Buckingham Palace behind them. Furthermore, it appears the idiots they are threatening with their firearms are on a public sidewalk. If that's the case, then the couple should be arrested. It's a private street, not open to the public. The "protesters" were the ones posing the threat and were clearly trespassing. OK, then I was wrong and I stand corrected. (See, VP, that's how you do it.) And for those who would insist their mansion is an example of white privilege, I suspect their home is no larger than the ones owned by Tiger Woods, Lebron James and Michael Jordan. Money buys nice things.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Jun 29, 2020 6:35:54 GMT -8
Yeah, we need to have the second amendment so those people can protect their mansion. You've convinced me. If that guy didn't have an AR he'd be dead right now...those protesters were out for blood. Honestly Credo you post the most ridiculous shit from Twitter. I don’t understand your attitude. Don’t you believe people have a right to protect their property? What would you do if a mob threatened to loot, vandalize or set fire to your home? Would you gladly turn it over to them? These people have shown over and over that they are not reasonable. They take great pleasure in destroying property! So what would you do? He would only get concerned if they threatened his parents basement.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 29, 2020 10:21:26 GMT -8
Yeah, we need to have the second amendment so those people can protect their mansion. You've convinced me. If that guy didn't have an AR he'd be dead right now...those protesters were out for blood. Honestly Credo you post the most ridiculous shit from Twitter. I don’t understand your attitude. Don’t you believe people have a right to protect their property? What would you do if a mob threatened to loot, vandalize or set fire to your home? Would you gladly turn it over to them? These people have shown over and over that they are not reasonable. They take great pleasure in destroying property! So what would you do? Yes, that's exactly correct--whether it's a mansion, a one-bedroom flat in the ghetto, a "gay" bar, or a liquor store. The right to bear arms within the confines of the law is a necessary support to the right of self-defense, which is nothing more than the natural human right to protect one's person (and other innocents) and their property. That right applies equally to all people--rich or poor, black or white. Without this right society descends into the situation of rioting, assault, murder, and mob rule that has taken place over the past month when the authorities who we largely depend on for defense abdicate their sworn duties. People who trespass on private property--regardless of their cause--cease to be "peaceful protesters" and should be treated as a potential threat. Everyone understands that. Had that house been ransacked and destroyed we'd likely be seeing nothing about it in the media. Instead, the owners are being made out to be the villains for the sake of the Narrative. Insanity. God bless that couple for having the stones to stand up to the mob and defend their home.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Jun 29, 2020 10:24:40 GMT -8
You see, the standard is to wait until AFTER you're vandalized to defend your property...just like the cops are supposed to wait until AFTER they see the weapon or are shot at to open fire.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 29, 2020 10:33:07 GMT -8
More "peaceful protesters" attacking people standing vigil at the statue of St. Louis (in St. Louis, MO, same city as he incident above), which was vandalized over the weekend. This is what Joe Biden and the Democrats support right now. They've gone after Christianity now (which is in line with the official BLM agenda) and there is a massive backlash in the offing.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 29, 2020 11:01:50 GMT -8
More on the situation in St. Louis.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Jun 29, 2020 12:20:39 GMT -8
These faces belong on the 2A Mt. Rushmore.
|
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Jun 29, 2020 18:15:46 GMT -8
Yeah, we need to have the second amendment so those people can protect their mansion. You've convinced me. If that guy didn't have an AR he'd be dead right now...those protesters were out for blood. Honestly Credo you post the most ridiculous shit from Twitter. Missouri Revised Statutes Title XXXVIII. Crimes and Punishment; Peace Officers and Public Defenders § 563.041. Use of physical force in defense of property1. A person may, subject to the limitations of subsection 2, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes it necessary to prevent what he or she reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission by such person of stealing, property damage or tampering in any degree. 2. A person may use deadly force under circumstances described in subsection 1 only when such use of deadly force is authorized under other sections of this chapter. 3. The justification afforded by this section extends to the use of physical restraint as protective force provided that the actor takes all reasonable measures to terminate the restraint as soon as it is reasonable to do so. 4. The defendant shall have the burden of injecting the issue of justification under this section.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Jun 29, 2020 20:12:11 GMT -8
... So what would you do? I believe he would do what comes natural, bend over.
|
|