Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Dec 19, 2019 10:17:30 GMT -8
I'm sorry but Nancy Pelosi needs to be put out to pasture. It takes a lot to make even San Francisco look bad.....
|
|
|
Post by captaintrips on Dec 19, 2019 11:08:45 GMT -8
This is long. It doesn’t even start until minute 14 (just a “will start shortly” advisory prior to that. Understand, McConnell has never been on my “most admired” list. I don’t particularly like him. I encourage those who are supporting impeachment to listen to his whole speech. He is right: Watched it earlier this morning. It will be ignored by the demonic OR They will give us an endless offering of hate, lies and nonsense - betting that the people of America are stupid enough to buy the poison they're selling. SSDD
|
|
|
Post by Zebra on Dec 19, 2019 11:19:08 GMT -8
I just bought this hat on Amazon!
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Dec 19, 2019 12:04:04 GMT -8
Dems yesterday: Trump is such a threat to our democracy and our national security that we can't wait for the voters to remove him in the upcoming election. He needs to be impeached now.
Dems today: There's no urgency to send the case to the Senate.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,641
|
Post by MDDad on Dec 19, 2019 12:32:24 GMT -8
There is something seriously wrong with that woman.
|
|
|
Post by captaintrips on Dec 19, 2019 12:41:36 GMT -8
Dems yesterday: Trump is such a threat to our democracy and our national security that we can't wait for the voters to remove him in the upcoming election. He needs to be impeached now.Dems today: T here's no urgency to send the case to the Senate.Strange how what they say; " Trump is such a threat to our democracy and our national security that we can't wait for the voters to remove him in the upcoming election. He needs to be impeached now." What they MEAN; " Democrats are such a threat to America and America's national security, that we can't wait for the voters to remove them in the upcoming election !" It ALWAYS points back to THEM.... when the truth is old... Which isn't a surprise I guess. Liars will lie, that's what liberals have consistently shown themselves to be. Liars There is something seriously wrong with that woman. Diagnosis; Liberalism Look at what is happening in the cities of her own state
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Dec 19, 2019 13:02:25 GMT -8
She knows he'll be acquitted in the Senate, so she won't even send it over for the trial. A disgusting performance by the House orchestrated by 3 slimy Dems. Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler. In my opinion, this will backfire on them big time.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Dec 19, 2019 13:31:39 GMT -8
There is something seriously wrong with that woman. Nope... only something seriously wrong with her plan. she is listening to the wrong advice, and this all gets back to why she is pursuing in the first place: IF she has always known Trump would not be removed, THEN there must be another reason... which, I believe, is to besmirch his presidency in hopes of thwarting his re-election. If that is, in fact, her plan, then it makes sense she wants to drag her feet, now. Delaying serves two goals: - It offsets the humiliation they will suffer when he is acquitted; and
- It moves any further process, like a trial in the Senate, closer to Election Day so it will be fresh(er) in voters minds.
she is not intelligent or strategic enough to come up with any of this on her own...
so she has to be listening to the wrong advice.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,641
|
Post by MDDad on Dec 19, 2019 13:35:01 GMT -8
She knows he'll be acquitted in the Senate, so she won't even send it over for the trial. A disgusting performance by the House orchestrated by 3 slimy Dems. Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler. In my opinion, this will backfire on them big time. It may, but not personally. They are all from safe districts. Pelosi won her last reelection by 87% to 13%. Nadler won by 82% to 19%, and Schiff won by 78% to 22%. They are as safe as turds in a down comforter.
|
|
tarmac
Senior Statesman
Posts: 789
|
Post by tarmac on Dec 19, 2019 14:08:11 GMT -8
I think the Trump army getting knocked down is a good thing. We now know we are in a real fight and the gloves need to come off.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Dec 19, 2019 14:33:10 GMT -8
She knows he'll be acquitted in the Senate, so she won't even send it over for the trial. A disgusting performance by the House orchestrated by 3 slimy Dems. Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler. In my opinion, this will backfire on them big time. It may, but not personally. They are all from safe districts. Pelosi won her last reelection by 87% to 13%. Nadler won by 82% to 19%, and Schiff won by 78% to 22%. They are as safe as turds in a down comforter. Not counting on them taking it in the shorts personally. Just hope it is enough to stain the reputation of House Dems and give the Republicans a chance to turn it back in the next election.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,785
|
Post by Bick on Dec 19, 2019 15:02:40 GMT -8
She's incredibly glib, ain't she?
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Dec 19, 2019 15:10:12 GMT -8
Look at her eyes, her inability to focus on what she’s saying, the unclear speech... she High on something.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,641
|
Post by MDDad on Dec 19, 2019 15:46:17 GMT -8
No, Dave, I don't think she's high at all. Sadly, I suspect it's something much more sinister than being high. She turns 80 in three months. Assuming this video (and more than a few others I've seen of her) isn't edited, I see the inability to recall the words she's looking for, the disjointed grammar and syntax, the halting starts and stops in her sentences and in her train of thought. Luca can speak to this better than I can, because he's a physician and not because he's a geezer, but my opinion is that she's showing all the signs of declining into early dementia.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Dec 19, 2019 17:05:33 GMT -8
This thread started with a poll in which 11 of us voted on whether or not Trumomwould be impeached.
Since he has now almost been impeached (won’t be official until the articles are delivered to the Senate), should we ban all those who said he would not be?
Surveys have consequences.
|
|