Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Oct 22, 2019 12:51:36 GMT -8
All these cases have similar circumstances, whether it's a baker, a florist, or a photographer. The continuing insistence by some that these business owners are motivated by bigotry and refuse to serve gays simply because they're gay flies in the face of the history of theses same businesses and is intellectually dishonest.
Watch this video on Jack Phillips, the Colorado baker who, by the way, won his case in the Supreme Court (after this video was made). The same court that upheld same-sex marriage also upheld the right of Jack Phillips not to be forced to create a message he disagrees with. That's called freedom. As you will hear in his own words, he also refuses to make cakes that are anti-American, that celebrate divorce, or that are derogatory of individuals. He has sold cakes and other products to likely hundreds of gay people over the years--he simply will not make a cake the celebrate a same-sex marriage. In the case of Washington florist Baronelle Stutzman, the man whose same-sex marriage floral arrangement she turned down was a longtime customer and friend.
These exact situations were what many opponents of legalizing same-sex warned about for years. Redefining marriage by judicial fiat would result in these types of downstream conflicts which are fundamental threats to 1st Amendment rights and freedoms.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 22, 2019 12:57:41 GMT -8
Been there, done that.
Of course the people here who claim to be Christians are the worst sort when it comes to the treatment of gays. Just read this thread and several others. Your theory about me is undoubtedly right, but you're forgetting all the gay people to whom they wish to deny various and sundry services. Rather ironic that it's the Christians who want to make it ok to tell gay people there's no room for them at the inn.
|
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Oct 22, 2019 13:22:10 GMT -8
VP, Who're the ones who are suing? Destroying the livelihood and lives of someone who disagrees with them. I just don't see the tolerance that Liberals are supposed to be known for. Especially in the last 3 years.
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on Oct 22, 2019 17:49:02 GMT -8
Nobody is disputing whether the plaintiff has a legal right to a homosexual marriage. The dispute is whether his having that right permits him to violate somebody else's civil rights by compelling him to to participate in it. Nobody is keeping the clown from getting married or getting his cake. The plaintiff is just being an entitled wus who thinks he has the right to compel other people's behavior. He's not being denied the right to buy a cake because he's a homosexual. He is simply not going to get his homosexual wedding cake from this baker because homosexual weddings are anathema to his Constitutionally guaranteed right to "free exercise" of his religion. The distinction is not all that complex
You seem unable to perceive this as involving anything else except you and your feelings of victimization and expansive entitlement. There is no civil right to a life free of hurt feelings.
I assume you have seen the signs in so many business establishments reading: "We reserve the right to refuse service." You can refuse service to someone because of language, dress, behavior, profession and even apparently politics. But you would have us belief that somehow for homosexual marriage we must preserve a unique and special status that compels all American citizens to celebrate and participate in it. This is the epitome of entitlement.
I think you get an emotional catharsis from portraying yourself as offended and victimized. No one said your "rights are dubious" or anything close to it. We all have acknowledged rights, but sometimes our behavior can be pretty dubious………………………………………….Luca
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on Oct 22, 2019 18:59:14 GMT -8
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Oct 22, 2019 19:17:26 GMT -8
Regarding the SC case with the baker, not only had he created & sold cakes to dozens of gay people, he had sold numerous cakes to that specific couple who sued him. He specifically told them he did not want to be involved in a gay marriage ceremony. he felt that making a cake was condoning the institution of gay marriage, which was against his religious beliefs. Nonetheless, if they had continued to ask him to bake things for them personally, he would have done so.
I like MDDad & Coach (no, they are not a gay couple). If they wanted to have me build a home theater for them, I would. However, if they asked me to do a sound system for Mater Dei football, I would decline. Nothing against them personally, Ijust have no interest in condoning an institution that goes against my belief system of what high school football should be.
As far as how Christians treat gays, the more spiritual and closer to following the bible a person is, the more that person treats gay folks positively. Christians who are strong with their faith love people despite any sins that those people may be involved in. It is those who use their religion as a weapon, who really aren't true believers but want to hide in a group who are the people who treat gay people badly. Not surprisingly, those toxic people also treat women badly, minorities badly, children badly and usually kick the dog when they get home.
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,316
|
Post by Luca on Oct 22, 2019 19:27:29 GMT -8
Regarding the SC case with the baker, not only had he created & sold cakes to dozens of gay people, he had sold numerous cakes to that specific couple who sued him. He specifically told them he did not want to be involved in a gay marriage ceremony. he felt that making a cake was condoning the institution of gay marriage, which was against his religious beliefs. Nonetheless, if they had continued to ask him to bake things for them personally, he would have done so. I didn’t know that. Well, there’s a pretty good example of a couple of self absorbed a-holes.................Luca
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 23, 2019 3:47:26 GMT -8
Not a "dubious" marriage?
I would dispute your claim, and possibly his, that he's being asked to "participate" in any way in this gay marriage.
I would dispute that claim as well. It seems to me that the baker is certainly preventing the clients form "getting" their cake.
Is that what the black people who wanted to sit at he lunch counter were being? How is this different?
No, it's not complex at all, It's painfully simple. The baker doesn't like gay marriage. In my opinion the baker should suck it up and make the cake anyway just like the worker at the lunch counter should stuff their bigotry deep down inside of themselves and serve the black people like they were real people.
You seem to want to take this conversation to a lower place. I'm totally unconcerned with your irrelevant feelings about me.
There is also no right enumerated in the Constitution which guarantees that everyone will follow the same religion as the baker. He has no right to expect patrons of his business to behave according to what he believes.
And your statements claiming that gays are demanding others celebrate and participate in their weddings are the epitome of absurdity. It would be like if I claimed that the baker was attempting to foist his religion on everyone else by his stance on gay wedding cakes.
I think the same about you and your ridiculous claims about having to celebrate gay marriage.
You said gay marriage was "dubious". I can only assume you don't think the same about your marriage.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 23, 2019 3:59:38 GMT -8
The specific details if this case are not that important to me, and honestly I'm sure the baker is a nice man, and likely the plaintiffs in this case were a bit overzealous in their actions. My concern is that discrimination against gay people not become enshrined in our law books as "freedom of religion".
I completely agree. For my part I have nothing whatever against Christians in general. My best friend here in Philly is very much involved in his church, but is NOT the type of person you mention in the following passage...
Again, I completely agree...and very well said, sir. I wonder if the people here who that applies to will even notice.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Oct 23, 2019 7:33:12 GMT -8
Excellent question. Expect it to be discounted as irrelevant, a bad comparison, or simply ignored. I think you'll find this sort of discrimination is only reserved for gays...because God doesn't like gay people, so it's ok for Christians to treat them badly. As a matter of fact, it makes them better Christians if they treat gays badly...or so the thinking apparently goes. Maybe you should move to California. Christians don't treat gays badly here. Or maybe it's just you they don't like. That is an obsolete, long debunked myth some homosexuals still cling to. Christians don’t mistreat homosexuals except for rare splinter groups with various, un-Scriptural motivations. To broadly accuse all Christians of abusing homosexuals is as fallacious as accusing all homosexuals of being ass hats like our present guest.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 23, 2019 8:40:26 GMT -8
Nonsense, it applies perfectly to you.
Well, you desire to mistreat homosexuals, so what does that make you? Besides having shit-for-brains, apparently you're also so cowardly you won't even admit your beliefs. You denigrate homosexuals with your absurd statements, you advocate for them to be denied rights and discriminated against, and then you try to tell me you don't mistreat gays? It is to laugh.
Get back to me when you find the courage to defend your beliefs.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Oct 23, 2019 16:34:05 GMT -8
Vile pagan, you are incorrect in claiming that Dave has mistreated you because you are gay. Any negative treatment you have received from Dave, and myself as well, has been based on your behavior, not your sexual orientation.
If other people treat you bad, I would bet it is probably based on your personality. Being brutally truthful, you often come across as a snarky, condescending, little bitch who has a chip on his shoulder. Now if that chip is your sexuality and how people who should have loved you instead rejected you based on it, then it is understandable why you choose to act that way. However, it is still a choice, you can reject those who rejected you and instead choose to be a decent person who happens to love dick.
You catch flack from the people on this board because you choose to act like a flamboyant, boring twat. Knock that act off, make your case for your views without the drama & snark and I know the other on people on this forum will respond in kind.
|
|
|
Post by coach on Oct 23, 2019 16:45:52 GMT -8
Regarding the SC case with the baker, not only had he created & sold cakes to dozens of gay people, he had sold numerous cakes to that specific couple who sued him. He specifically told them he did not want to be involved in a gay marriage ceremony. he felt that making a cake was condoning the institution of gay marriage, which was against his religious beliefs. Nonetheless, if they had continued to ask him to bake things for them personally, he would have done so. I like MDDad & Coach (no, they are not a gay couple). If they wanted to have me build a home theater for them, I would. However, if they asked me to do a sound system for Mater Dei football, I would decline. Nothing against them personally, Ijust have no interest in condoning an institution that goes against my belief system of what high school football should be. As far as how Christians treat gays, the more spiritual and closer to following the bible a person is, the more that person treats gay folks positively. Christians who are strong with their faith love people despite any sins that those people may be involved in. It is those who use their religion as a weapon, who really aren't true believers but want to hide in a group who are the people who treat gay people badly. Not surprisingly, those toxic people also treat women badly, minorities badly, children badly and usually kick the dog when they get home. Bigot! LOL
|
|
|
Post by coach on Oct 23, 2019 16:49:55 GMT -8
The truth is, why do we even care if you are gay or not? Why is it such an issue? Why do you care what people think? Why do I care who you sleep with? Why not be a person and get along? Like discussions of racism. It's boring and nobody wins.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Oct 24, 2019 3:34:55 GMT -8
Dave's words speak for themselves, you do not speak for him. If Dave isn't mistreating me because I'm gay, why does he mention my homosexuality so often? Your attempt to apologize for his behavior is noble but not very convincing....besides I doubt he wants to apologize.
That would be much more believable if Dave's attacks on me didn't start long before I ever showed up here.
Being brutally truthful, I haven't tried to come across any other way.
Really. How do you explain the nasty shit people were saying about me when I wasn't here?
I think you give your fellow posters here way too much credit.
|
|