Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Sept 21, 2020 7:51:50 GMT -8
Biden does not support abortion, he supports following the law. Idiotic wordsmithing strikes again. By this logic, if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned--like Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education (1954)--Joe Biden wouldn't, at that point, be opposing a woman's "right to choose," he'd just be in favor of following the (current) law. Which simply means he has no principles other than supporting whoever happens to wield the most power at any given time. I suppose if Biden lived in South Carolina in 1861 he could claim he didn't support slavery, he just supported following the law. If he lived in Nazi Germany he wouldn't have supported sending Jews to concentration camps, he just supported following the law. So if Joe Biden simply supports "following the law," why does he oppose the Trump tax cuts that were lawfully passed by the House and Senate? Those are the law of the land, aren't they? |
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Sept 21, 2020 8:43:18 GMT -8
Joe Biden supports following the law? Might honestly be the stupidest thing I’ve seen posted on this forum...
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 21, 2020 12:51:00 GMT -8
Biden does not support abortion, he supports following the law. Idiotic wordsmithing strikes again. By this logic, if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned--like Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education (1954)--Joe Biden wouldn't, at that point, be opposing a woman's "right to choose," he'd just be in favor of following the (current) law. Which simply means he has no principles other than supporting whoever happens to wield the most power at any given time. No Credo, that's not what "following the law" means. It means that Biden will uphold even laws he disagrees with personally. Unlike the current occupant who just does what he wants. |
|
|
|
Post by Oakley on Sept 21, 2020 13:19:37 GMT -8
Idiotic wordsmithing strikes again. By this logic, if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned--like Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education (1954)--Joe Biden wouldn't, at that point, be opposing a woman's "right to choose," he'd just be in favor of following the (current) law. Which simply means he has no principles other than supporting whoever happens to wield the most power at any given time. No Credo, that's not what "following the law" means. It means that Biden will uphold even laws he disagrees with personally. Unlike the current occupant who just does what he wants. Give some examples. |
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Sept 21, 2020 13:37:22 GMT -8
So I assume that means Biden and Kamala are going to uphold the strict criminal justice reform that their fellow BLMers are currently protesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 23, 2020 12:57:49 GMT -8
No Credo, that's not what "following the law" means. It means that Biden will uphold even laws he disagrees with personally. Unlike the current occupant who just does what he wants. Give some examples. Examples of what? |
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Sept 24, 2020 16:25:41 GMT -8
Looks like this may be in Idaho (Moscow.....ironic). These police officers should be ashamed of themselves for carrying this out.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Feb 5, 2021 16:39:14 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Feb 7, 2021 3:07:37 GMT -8
You want freedom to worship as you see fit that includes the Satanists. Their ideas aren't any sillier than yours.
|
|
