davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 19, 2021 5:56:42 GMT -8
Forget it, Professor. Snowflake has no interest in a real discussion. Regardless of how much logic and facts you give it, it's only purpose here is to antagonize and drive this community into the same hole it has driven at least two others.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 19, 2021 8:08:36 GMT -8
Sure you are. Perhaps you could tell me how your "divorce" is different from secession, and why it would be allowed under the Constitution. Sure, no problem. I'm talking about a mutually agreed upon split, not a secession. Unless the intent is to lord over the citizenry against their wishes, you'd have to agree this is not a healthy relationship with left and right. Have you ever seen that acknowledgment from anyone on the left, or the right when they were in power?
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,815
|
Post by MDDad on Sept 19, 2021 8:26:23 GMT -8
Unless the intent is to lord over the citizenry against their wishes, you'd have to agree this is not a healthy relationship with left and right. Have you ever seen that acknowledgment from anyone on the left, or the right when they were in power? I certainly agree that the relationship is as unhealthy as it's been in 160 years. But the more important question is whether or not its a viable one. Have we reached the level of personal dislike and contempt that makes us totally unable to function as a nation? With almost every passing week, even the people who would answer No seem to have more and more doubts.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,815
|
Post by MDDad on Sept 19, 2021 8:57:29 GMT -8
Well Bick I'm enough of a student of American history to know that secession is a non-starter. No, VP, you're really not, so please don't flatter yourself. You've demonstrated your ignorance of history multiple times on this board and on OCConnect. You seem to confuse being " a student of history" with being " an ignorant wannabe who stubbornly defends what he's found after a two-minute google search", and that's an insult to those people who have actually studied the subject. I, and most of the conservatives I know, believe a woman has the right to do anything she wants sexually, including having sex 24/7 with a different guy every day. But one of the easiest things in the world is to not get pregnant. If she does, because she and her "partner" are too stupid, lazy or horny to prevent it, then she now represents two human beings and shouldn't have the unilateral right to kill one of them. Fortunately for her, she has the somewhat arbitrary right to do just that because of some bizarre legal interpretation of the "right to privacy". By extension, I should be able to tie someone up in my garage, kill them by pulling off their arms or legs, or crushing their skulls, or disembowling them (i.e. perhaps the three most common ways unborn children are killed), as long as I do it in private. What's good for the goose should be good for the gander. I, and most of the conservatives I know, think LGBTQ people should have the same rights as anyone else. If two gay people want to stand in front of a justice or preacher and "get married", they certainly have that right. But marriage has evolved a very specific meaning in the last 3,000+ years to many of us, so we have the personal right to not recognize or respect that union. And a gay couple should never have the right to force a baker to bake them a wedding cake if he is morally opposed to doing so. And no man who has a mental illness that makes him think he's a woman should have the right to walk into a women's restroom, lockerroom, gym or other establishment and flash his junk to women and small girls. His mental illness does not override common sense and everyone else's rights, and the world should not be required to indulge his mental illness and accept it as normal. That's probably the hundredth time you've tried to put words in someone else's mouth that they didn't say. My friend did not say this country is a piece of fruit. He pointed out that the life cycle of many world powers bears a resemblance to the life cycle of a piece of fruit, and his analogy is apt. If you were half the "student of history" you claim to be, you would know that Greece, Rome, Spain, at least two dynasties in both China and India, and many others have followed that path. But I guess you didn't bother to google that. This country has been ascendant for over a century, and it has never truly faced an existential threat to its survival. But the internal rot imposed on us by the left is moving us past the "soft and mushy" phase very quickly.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 19, 2021 9:32:23 GMT -8
... That's probably the hundredth time you've tried to put words in someone else's mouth that they didn't say. My friend did not say this country is a piece of fruit. He pointed out that the life cycle of many world powers bears a resemblance to the life cycle of a piece of fruit, and his analogy is apt. If you were half the "student of history" you claim to be, you would know that Greece, Rome, Spain, at least two dynasties in both China and India, and many others have followed that path. But I guess you didn't bother to google that. This country has been ascendant for over a century, and it has never truly faced an existential threat to its survival. But the internal rot imposed on us by the left is moving us past the "soft and mushy" phase very quickly. I've been reading through Systematic Theology, by Vincent Cheung and he just made a similar point:
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 19, 2021 9:37:03 GMT -8
Unless the intent is to lord over the citizenry against their wishes, you'd have to agree this is not a healthy relationship with left and right. Have you ever seen that acknowledgment from anyone on the left, or the right when they were in power? I certainly agree that the relationship is as unhealthy as it's been in 160 years. But the more important question is whether or not its a viable one. Have we reached the level of personal dislike and contempt that makes us totally unable to function as a nation? With almost every passing week, even the people who would answer No seem to have more and more doubts. Ok, thanks for clarifying. Unhealthy implies the relationship could become healthy again. Maybe our discussion with the left should focus on THAT? What would it take to have a healthy, VIABLE relationship again? Absent that, shouldn't we move toward ending it?
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,815
|
Post by MDDad on Sept 19, 2021 9:54:45 GMT -8
What would it take to have a healthy, VIABLE relationship again? I think any marriage or relationship counselor would say there are at least two critical prerequisites to that happening. One is that both sides have to WANT it. I suspect more every day that that is no longer the case. The second is that both sides have to RESPECT the other, and we may be way past that as well. I also always believed hat something like a dangerous, global pandemic could provide that unifying force, but it has proven to provide just the opposite. Doesn't paint a very rosy picture, does it?
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 19, 2021 11:08:06 GMT -8
Having been throughnthe breakup of my first marriage and, subsequently, counseling others who were going through their own separations and divorces, while it might or might not be a directly applicable analogy to the condition of our republic today, I can tell you, marriages CAN be reconciled if even one of the partners remains true to the commitment.
NOT that I necessarily disagree completely with MDDad: It certainly is easier and quicker when both partners want it, but it CAN happen through one determined partner... I've seen it happen several times.
HOWEVER, I am seeing trenches being dug today in America and not so many bridges. So reconciliation is not possible if neither partner has any interest in preserving the relationship.
|
|
SK80
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 7,377
|
Post by SK80 on Sept 19, 2021 11:44:41 GMT -8
I also always believed hat something like a dangerous, global pandemic could provide that unifying force, but it has proven to provide just the opposite. Doesn't paint a very rosy picture, does it? Our "dividers" are winning, social media "fueling" the division, its a very toxic present day environment.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Sept 19, 2021 12:09:57 GMT -8
Obama got this started with his dividing us into the haves and have nots and pitting blacks against whites, women against men, liberals against normal people 😜...
when Trump took over, the elites really kicked it into high gear and they pulled Antifa/BLM out od the shadows and made them domestic terrorists...
this is their plan... break us up.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 19, 2021 12:39:46 GMT -8
Sure you are. Perhaps you could tell me how your "divorce" is different from secession, and why it would be allowed under the Constitution. Sure, no problem. I'm talking about a mutually agreed upon split, not a secession. So you're talking about a fantasy. Who would "mutually agree" and how would this agreement be formalized? By vote? By referendum? By Congress?
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 19, 2021 12:47:18 GMT -8
Well Bick I'm enough of a student of American history to know that secession is a non-starter. No, VP, you're really not, so please don't flatter yourself. You've demonstrated your ignorance of history multiple times on this board and on OCConnect. You seem to confuse being " a student of history" with being " an ignorant wannabe who stubbornly defends what he's found after a two-minute google search", and that's an insult to those people who have actually studied the subject. Bite me. You're just an arrogant prick who think he's the only one who ever studied history. You're convinced that everything you learned in school is the truth. I'm not that naive.I, and most of the conservatives I know, believe ..... Yeah, I know what you believe but what you avoided saying is that many conservatives would codify your beliefs into law just like you accuse the left of wanting to do. You're no different.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 19, 2021 12:51:04 GMT -8
I also always believed hat something like a dangerous, global pandemic could provide that unifying force, but it has proven to provide just the opposite. Doesn't paint a very rosy picture, does it? Our "dividers" are winning, social media "fueling" the division, its a very toxic present day environment. Funny how you guys are the ones talking about how terrible the other side is and how it's gotten so bad you want to secede...but you blame these 'dividers' for your own desires.
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 19, 2021 12:52:12 GMT -8
Obama got this started with his dividing us into the haves and have nots and pitting blacks against whites, women against men, liberals against normal people 😜... when Trump took over, the elites really kicked it into high gear and they pulled Antifa/BLM out od the shadows and made them domestic terrorists... this is their plan... break us up. No, it's all you. You're the problem, not some imaginary "elites".
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,815
|
Post by MDDad on Sept 19, 2021 12:54:41 GMT -8
Yeah, I know what you believe but what you avoided saying is that many conservatives would codify your beliefs into law just like you accuse the left of wanting to do. You're no different. Yes, it should be codified that a confused, mentally ill man can't walk into a womens gym and dangle his (semi-erect) dick in front of little girls. It should be codified that nobody has the right to force someone else to perform labor against his will (we fought a war over that, as you like to say). And it should be codified that a woman can't unilaterally kill her unborn child because having it would be inconvenient.
|
|