Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Mar 21, 2019 19:53:23 GMT -8
I think we can talk about the ideological differences between liberals and conservatives until we're blue in the face, but I think how they behave with those differences is even more fascinating. I formed this opinion almost 30 years ago, and all the time that's passed makes me more and more convinced I was right: Conservatives just seem to want to be left alone. They are tolerant of others' ideologies as long as it doesn't infringe on them or their rights to believe as they do. Their feeling seems to be: "Go ahead and smoke pot, or marry your sister, or have two dudes get married, or whatever else you want. Just leave me alone to live with my values and beliefs. Let me keep most of what I earn, and I'll take responsibility for my family and their welfare." I've shared that outlook for most of my adult life. Live and let live, although I do have one caveat: If I had a little girl, and she walked into a public restroom at the mall, and some dude walked in after her because he felt like a woman that day, I would not leave well enough alone. That guy would have a major problem with me much larger than his gender confusion, and he'd likely really be woman before he came back out of that john. Liberals are just the opposite. They are absolutely convinced that they are not only more intelligent and informed than their conservative brethren, but that they are also politically and socially more highly evolved and enlightened. They are the homo sapiens to our Neanderthals. It's what leads to their infuriating attitudes of smugness, superiority and condescension. Furthermore, they believe they know what is best for everyone in every situation, and they insist on forcing their beliefs down everyone else's throats for that reason. It's their way or the highway, and they are convinced they must convert the world to their way of thinking. Everything in America's past is shamed or undercut for the utopia they have in their minds. I'd like the members here to tell me if I'm on to something, or if I'm full of crap. The incredible degree of pansy-assed smugness puts me over the edge.
|
|
Luca
Master Statesman
Posts: 1,317
|
Post by Luca on Mar 22, 2019 11:05:09 GMT -8
I apologize in advance if what I’m about to say is redundant, perhaps having already been stated in this 5 page long thread. I haven’t been keeping up on this board and don’t feel like reading a hundred posts to make sure I’m not wasting cyberspace............
I cannot stand ideologists, people who blindly believe that their philosophical principles will unerringly lead them to the "correct" opinions and behaviors. If there were such a perfect philosophy, it would have ascended to dominance by now. There is a reason that none has. It’s like the practice of medicine: When you see several different treatment options for a given condition it means that no one of them is ideal, otherwise it wouldn’t have competitors.
Having said that, I do favor conservatism if only because in most cases existing policies and procedures have stood the test of time. They evolved because they worked better than competing policies and procedures. People are comfortable with them. There may be realities out there that should be changed, but most of the time - at least in my experience in the US - they are the better options. There are always exceptions. LBJ once at that "Doing the right thing is easy. What’s hard is knowing what the right thing is." And there is no philosophy that guarantees the best option.
Conservatism is more logic based. It takes what seems to have worked best in the past and is skeptical of rejecting them in favor of novel theories born of idealism or emotion. Progressivism is based on nebulous -if admirable - concepts of fairness and justice and equality. In theory there is nothing wrong with that except that it too often leads to counterintuitive and objectionable results. But since its adherents feel that their opinions represent the higher aspirations and nobility of man, they too often conclude that their philosophical opponents must de facto represent the opposite. This is ultimately what I think leads to the sense of superiority, both intellectual and moral.
It’s hard to debate someone who is convinced that he a priori holds the intellectual and moral high ground. Your disagreement only serves to substantiate his/her conviction that you are unworthy of being taken or treated with mutual respect. Any debate eventually can become a contest of morals and it’s like arguing with a 1960s Hare Krishna…………………………….Luca
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Mar 22, 2019 11:49:35 GMT -8
Arguing with a Hare Krishna...You're killing me Smalls. Way too funny.
|
|
RSM789
Eminence Grise
Posts: 2,286
|
Post by RSM789 on Mar 24, 2019 11:04:34 GMT -8
...It takes what seems to have worked best in the past and is skeptical of rejecting them in favor of novel theories born of idealism or emotion... Or as the old saying goes, replacing what works with what sounds good.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Mar 25, 2019 9:33:53 GMT -8
Chris Matthews engages in the Left's favorite activity: PROJECTION
And John Brennan, Obama's CIA Director.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Mar 27, 2019 8:24:19 GMT -8
How many people have to have their reputations destroyed on behalf of the Obamas and the Clintons?
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Mar 27, 2019 14:51:53 GMT -8
I came across an interesting look at how democrats think and want you to think in Nancy’s press conference. On occasion of the house launch of their version of AOC’s green dumb deal, for which they were apparently waiting for the circus vote in the senate to crash the original version before coming out with their own in H.R. 9, the “Climate Action Now Act.” i will state here, for all to see and throw up over, that I agree with Nancy Pelosi. (I’ll just let that hang there for a moment)... The article in CNS News Service carries the full text of her little speech, so I will reproduce it here: See if you don’t also agree with her. but here’s the deal. Talk about being responsible stewards IS man’s responsibility it does nothing to mitigate (or even impact) the cyclical cooling and aarming of the earth. Democrats use the conflation of related, but different ideas to persuade you they have your best interests at heart. They talk about green, they talk about R&D, but that is all nonsense related to the vain attempts to regulate climate change and nothing to do with man’s responsibility to be good stewards of the planets resources.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,815
|
Post by MDDad on Mar 27, 2019 15:49:58 GMT -8
Dave, I agree with you. I have two other observations:
(1) When she referred to earth as "God's creation", she probably lost a big chunk of her audience.
(2) Good-paying green jobs, advancing our economy, public health, clean air and clean water for our children, moral responsibilities, etc. are all great buzzwords. But her entire message was all platitudes and no substance. What are the specifics, because that's where things usually start to get silly.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Mar 27, 2019 20:32:19 GMT -8
1. Human beings are called to be good stewards of creation--absolutely. Both common sense and Scripture tell us so.
2. The Green New Deal has little if anything to do with the above. It's nothing more than a power-grab by those who have substituted worship of the one, true God for faith in centralized government planning.
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Mar 28, 2019 5:18:47 GMT -8
1. Human beings are called to be good stewards of creation--absolutely. Both common sense and Scripture tell us so. 2. The Green New Deal has little if anything to do with the above. It's nothing more than a power-grab by those who have substituted worship of the one, true God for faith in centralized government planning. Yes, and that is why I put this in “ The Liberal Mindset-Why?” thread. liberals know this has nothing to do with being a good steward of God’s creation and, what’s more, they don’t care. I agree with MDDad, also in his observation she probably lost a part of her audience by referencing God, but she doesn’t care: She was pandering and in her liberal mind, her supporters won’t leave her but her pandering “will” bring conservative Christians more open to the idea (note, I said “in her liberal mind”). this method of conflating two similar ... but separate ideas is their stock in trade. They have most recently (also) used it to infer conservatives oppose “immigrants” and don’t care that the truth is, we oppose illegal immigrants.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Mar 28, 2019 8:15:03 GMT -8
After reading what Dave posted, it occurs to me that the analogy that best describes the liberal approach is they are selling the benefits of eating at Home Town Buffet to anyone who would listen, while at the same time they're sitting around a table at Tom Keller's little restaurant up in Yountville.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,815
|
Post by MDDad on Mar 28, 2019 8:30:13 GMT -8
Bick, are you implying that liberals are hypocrites? My God, what a novel theory!
|
|
davidsf
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 5,252
|
Post by davidsf on Mar 28, 2019 9:08:30 GMT -8
Well, yes, they are hypocrites but they seem to believe that is their due. Over and over, we hear them jumping from one side of an issue to another as it suits their argument du jour.
I conjoin this proclivity towards hypocrisy to all the talk about Bill and Hillary being part of “the elites” who are far removed from those they pretend to represent.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,815
|
Post by MDDad on Mar 28, 2019 9:24:02 GMT -8
I would love to see a survey of all legislators nationwide who are big-time proponents of green energy and saving the environment, with a listing of how many of them drive electric cars, have solar panels on their roofs, and use fans instead of air conditioning in their homes.
|
|
Credo
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,242
|
Post by Credo on Mar 28, 2019 9:58:08 GMT -8
1. Human beings are called to be good stewards of creation--absolutely. Both common sense and Scripture tell us so. 2. The Green New Deal has little if anything to do with the above. It's nothing more than a power-grab by those who have substituted worship of the one, true God for faith in centralized government planning. Yes, and that is why I put this in “ The Liberal Mindset-Why?” thread. liberals know this has nothing to do with being a good steward of God’s creation and, what’s more, they don’t care. I agree with MDDad, also in his observation she probably lost a part of her audience by referencing God, but she doesn’t care: She was pandering and in her liberal mind, her supporters won’t leave her but her pandering “will” bring conservative Christians more open to the idea (note, I said “in her liberal mind”). this method of conflating two similar ... but separate ideas is their stock in trade. They have most recently (also) used it to infer conservatives oppose “immigrants” and don’t care that the truth is, we oppose illegal immigrants. You probably also remember when Obama invoked the Bible to support tax increases on the rich. Try not to get nauseous reading this, as the moral ironies abound.
|
|