|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 10, 2020 6:28:08 GMT -8
He WAS shot 7 times in "non-lethal" spots, otherwise he would be dead. He's not. Also, I suspect that he could have been hit in a lethal spot in the leg (a main artery, perhaps?) causeing him to bleed out before help arrives. Luca? Come on, man, let's not get silly. Too late. You really should listen to all these suggestions, after all these guys watch cops on TV every day, they must know what they're talking about. Right? |
|
Bick
Administrator 
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 23, 2020 6:16:34 GMT -8
Wow - talk about rush to judgement by the Kenosha DA on Rittenhouse. The Carlson video is worth a look as it clearly shows a MUCH different intent by Rittenhouse than what's been portrayed.
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 23, 2020 9:14:16 GMT -8
Wow - talk about rush to judgement by the Kenosha DA on Rittenhouse. The Carlson video is worth a look as it clearly shows a MUCH different intent by Rittenhouse than what's been portrayed. Why do you assume the DA hasn't seen this footage? If they haven't, why hasn't Mr. Carlson shared the video with them rather than air it publicly? |
|
duke
Statesman
Posts: 681
|
Post by duke on Sept 23, 2020 9:25:45 GMT -8
Could it be that the Kenosha DA is a spineless Democrat that rushed to judgement instead of rushing to justice?
|
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Sept 23, 2020 10:53:41 GMT -8
He ain’t going to be found guilty of anything besides crossing state lines with a gun.
Book it.
|
|
Bick
Administrator
Posts: 6,900
|
Post by Bick on Sept 23, 2020 11:50:23 GMT -8
Wow - talk about rush to judgement by the Kenosha DA on Rittenhouse. The Carlson video is worth a look as it clearly shows a MUCH different intent by Rittenhouse than what's been portrayed. Why do you assume the DA hasn't seen this footage? If they haven't, why hasn't Mr. Carlson shared the video with them rather than air it publicly? He was charged with M1 within 48 hours of the incident. I believe the DA would have seen this video since that time as I doubt it was "in the can" at the time of the incident. We'll see just how strong the case is if / when it goes to trial. My sense is the DA brought max charges against the kids in order to attempt to keep the peace. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 23, 2020 12:39:16 GMT -8
Why do you assume the DA hasn't seen this footage? If they haven't, why hasn't Mr. Carlson shared the video with them rather than air it publicly? He was charged with M1 within 48 hours of the incident..... My sense is the DA brought max charges against the kids in order to attempt to keep the peace. I think you're probably right...now tell that to your friends who seem to think the DA is just some wacky Democrat. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 23, 2020 12:49:03 GMT -8
He ain’t going to be found guilty of anything besides crossing state lines with a gun. Book it. Well, since it's being reported that he didn't cross state lines with the gun (it was given to him by someone in WI) I think you're way off. At the very least I suspect he'll be found guilty of Reckless Endangerment, but I think it likely that he'll plead out to manslaughter of some kind. |
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Sept 23, 2020 13:54:52 GMT -8
If you’re pleading out to voluntary manslaughter over reckless endangerment, you’re either a moron or you have a terrible attorney
|
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Sept 23, 2020 13:57:03 GMT -8
Also, Prosecutors always overcharge because you’re only able to reduce, not increase.
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Sept 23, 2020 15:37:07 GMT -8
If you’re pleading out to voluntary manslaughter over reckless endangerment, you’re either a moron or you have a terrible attorney Oops, VP must have googled those terms backwards. |
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 24, 2020 3:43:27 GMT -8
Oops, maybe you both should learn how to read. You do know how to read don't you?
"At the very least I suspect he'll be found guilty of Reckless Endangerment, but I think it likely that he'll plead out to manslaughter of some kind."
Does it say "voluntary" anywhere in my post?
|
|
|
|
Post by vilepagan on Sept 24, 2020 3:47:16 GMT -8
If you’re pleading out to voluntary manslaughter over reckless endangerment, you’re either a moron or you have a terrible attorney If you think someone would plead UP to Voluntary Manslaughter from Reckless Endangerment you're a terrible attorney. I was thinking he was charged with Homicide and will later be allowed to plead to Manslaughter. Note I didn't say anything about "voluntary" or otherwise. |
|
thefrog
Eminence Grise
Posts: 1,819
|
Post by thefrog on Sept 24, 2020 4:11:39 GMT -8
What other manslaughter do you think he could get?
Involuntary?
|
|
MDDad
Master Eminence Grise
Posts: 6,814
|
Post by MDDad on Sept 24, 2020 6:25:38 GMT -8
I was thinking he was charged with Homicide and will later be allowed to plead to Manslaughter. I was thinking VP should stop commenting on legal matters, because his ignorance becomes blinding when he tries to act like he knows what he's talking abut or forgets to google. Manslaughter is homicide. Homicide is the general term that comprises both manslaughter and murder, as well as legal killing such as military combat, accidents, euthanasia (where it's legal) and lethal injection of a convicted felon (where it's legal). |
|
